Very interesting show.
The thing that I took from this was about Francis and his encyclicals. A new encyclical is supposed to be issued by the Vatican sometime before the end of the month. Apparently, Evangelii Gaudium, one of Francis' first Exhortations, contains 23 theological errors and 53 theological doubts. These were declared by none other than the Holy Office itself! They told Francis that his Exhortation had these problems with it, but he published it without ANY corrections whatsoever!
This sermon from St. Alphonsus Ligouri is for the Sixteenth Sunday after Pentecost in the Traditional Latin Mass, which is today - 13th September 2020.
“And behold, there was a certain man before him, who had the dropsy.” LUKE xiv. 2
THE man who indulges in impurity is like a person labouring under the dropsy. The latter is so much tormented by thirst, that the more he drinks the more thirsty he becomes. Such, too, is the nature of the accursed vice of impurity; it is never satiated. “As,” says St. Thomas of Villanova , ”the more the dropsical man abounds in moisture, the more he thirsts; so, too, is it with the waves of eternal pleasures.” I will speak Today of the vice of impurity, and will show, in the first point, the delusion of those who say that this vice is but a small evil; and, in the second, the delusion of those who say, that God takes pity on this sin, and that he does not punish it.
First Point~ Delusion of those who say that sins against purity are not a great evil
1. The unchaste, then, say that sins contrary to purity are but a small evil. Like "the sow wallowing in the mire” (” Sus lota in volutabro luti – 2 Pet. ii. 22), they are immersed in their own filth, so that they do not see the malice of their actions; and therefore they neither feel nor abhor the stench of their impurities, which excite disgust and horror in all others. Can you, who say that the vice of impurity is but a small evil can you, I ask, deny that it is a mortal sin? If you deny it, you are a heretic; for as St. Paul says: “Do not err. Neither fornicators, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, etc., shall possess the kingdom of God.” (1 Cor. vi. 9.) It is a mortal sin; it cannot be a small evil. It is more sinful than theft, or detraction, or the violation of the fast. How then can you say that it is not a great evil? Perhaps mortal sin appears to you to be a small evil? Is it a small evil to despise the grace of God, to turn your back upon him, and to lose his friendship, for a transitory, beastly pleasure?
2. St. Thomas teaches, that mortal sin, because it is an insult offered to an infinite God, contains a certain infinitude of malice. “A sin committed against God has a certain infinitude, on account of the infinitude of the Divine Majesty.” (S. Thom., 3 p., q. 1, art. 2, ad. 2.) Is mortal sin a small evil? It is so great an evil, that if all the angels and all the saints, the apostles, martyrs, and even the Mother of God, offered all their merits to atone for a single mortal sin, the oblation would not be sufficient. No; for that atonement or satisfaction would be finite; but the debt contracted by mortal sin is infinite, on account of the infinite Majesty of God which has been offended. The hatred which God bears to sins against purity is great beyond measure. If a lady find her plate soiled she is disgusted, and cannot eat. Now, with what disgust and indignation must God, who is Purity itself, behold the filthy impurities by which his law is violated? He loves purity with an infinite love; and consequently he has an infinite hatred for the sensuality which the lewd, voluptuous man calls a small evil. Even the devils who held a high rank in heaven before their fall disdain to tempt men to sins of the flesh.
3. St. Thomas says (lib. 5, de Erud. Princ., c. li.), that Lucifer, who is supposed to have been the devil that tempted Jesus Christ in the desert, tempted him to commit other sins, but scorned to tempt him to offend against chastity. Is this sin a small evil? Is it, then, a small evil to see a man endowed with a rational soul, and enriched with so many divine graces, bring himself by the sin of impurity to the level of a brute?”Fornication and pleasure,” says St. Jerome, ”pervert the understanding, and change men into beasts.” (In Oseam., c. iv.) In the voluptuous and unchaste are literally verified the words of David: ”And man, when he was in honour, did not understand: he is compared to senseless beasts, and is become like to them.” (Ps. xlviii. 13.) St. Jerome says, that there is nothing more vile or degrading than to allow oneself to be conquered by the flesh. ”Nihil vilius quam vinci a carne.” Is it a small evil to forget God, and to banish him from the soul, for the sake of giving the body a vile satisfaction, of which, when it is over, you feel ashamed? Of this the Lord complains by the Prophet Ezechiel: ”Thus saith the Lord God: Because thou hast forgotten me, and has cast me off behind thy back”(xxiii. 35.) St. Thomas says, that by every vice, but particularly by the vice of impurity, men are removed far from God. ”Per luxuriant maxime recedit a Deo.” (In Job cap. xxxi.)
4. Moreover, sins of impurity, on account of their great number, are an immense evil. A blasphemer does not always blaspheme, but only when he is drunk or provoked to anger. The assassin, whose trade is to murder others, does not, at the most, commit more than eight or ten homicides. But the unchaste are guilty of an unceasing torrent of sins, by thoughts, by words, by looks, by complacencies, and by touches; so that, when they go to confession they find it impossible to tell the number of the sins they have committed against purity. Even in their sleep the devil represents to them obscene objects, that, on awakening, they may take delight in them; and because they are made the slaves of the enemy, they obey and consent to his suggestions; for it is easy to contract a habit of this sin. To other sins, such as blasphemy, detraction, and murder, men are not prone; but to this vice nature inclines them. Hence St. Thomas says, that there is no sinner so ready to offend God as the votary of lust is, on every occasion that occurs to him. ”Nullus ad Dei contemptum promptior.” The sin of impurity brings in its train the sins of defamation, of theft, hatred, and of boasting of its own filthy abominations. Besides, it ordinarily involves the malice of scandal. Other sins, such as blasphemy, perjury, and murder, excite horror in those who witness them; but this sin excites and draws others, who are flesh, to commit it, or, at least, to commit it with less horror.
5. ”Totum hominem,” says St. Cyprian, ”agit in triumphum libidinis.” (Lib. de bono pudic.) By lust the evil triumphs over the entire man, over his body and over his soul; over his memory, filling it with the remembrance of unchaste delights, in order to make him take complacency in them; over his intellect, to make him desire occasions of committing sin; over the will, by making it love its impurities as his last end, and as if there were no God. “I made,” said Job, “a covenant with my eyes, that I would not so much as think upon a virgin. For what part should God from above have in me?” (xxxi. 1, 2.) Job was afraid to look at a virgin, because he knew that if he consented to a bad thought God should have no part in him. According to St. Gregory, from impurity arises blindness of understanding, destruction, hatred of God, and despair of eternal life. ”De luxuria cœcitas mentis præcipitatio, odium Dei, desperatio futuri sæculi generantur.” (S. Greg., Mor., lib. 13.) St. Augustine says, though the unchaste may grow old, the vice of impurity does not grow old in them. Hence St. Thomas says, that there is no sin in which the devil delights so much as in this sin; because there is no other sin to which nature clings with so much tenacity. To the vice of impurity it adheres so firmly, that the appetite for carnal pleasures becomes insatiable. ”Diabolus dicitur gaudere maxime de peccato luxuriæ, quia est maximæ adhœrentia: et difficile ab eo homo eripi potest; insatiabilis est enim delectabilis appetitus.” (1, 2, qu. 73, a. 5, ad. 2.) Go now, and say that the sin of impurity is but a small evil. At the hour of death you shall not say so; every sin of that kind shall then appear to you a monster of hell. Much less shall you say so before the judgment-seat of Jesus Christ, who will tell you what the Apostle has already told you: “No fornicator, or unclean, hath inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God.” (Eph. v. 5.) The man who has lived like a brute does not deserve to sit with the angels.
6. Most beloved brethren, let us continue to pray to God to deliver us from this vice: if we do not, we shall lose our souls. The sin of impurity brings with it blindness and obstinacy. Every vice produces darkness of understanding; but impurity produces it in a greater degree than all other sins. ”Fornication, and wine, and drunkenness take away the understanding.” (Osee iv. 11.) Wine deprives us of understanding and reason; so does impurity. Hence St. Thomas says, that the man who indulges in unchaste pleasures, does not live according to reason. ”In nullo procedit secundum judicium rationis.” Now, if the unchaste are deprived of light, and no longer see the evil which they do, how can they abhor it and amend their lives? The Prophet Osee says, that being blinded by their own mire, they do not even think of returning to God; because their impurities take away from them all knowledge of God. ”They will not set their thought to return to their God; for the spirit of fornication is in the midst of them, and they have not known the Lord.” (Osee v. 4.) Hence St. Lawrence Justinian writes, that this sin makes men forget God. ”Delights of the flesh induced forgetfulness of God.” And St. John Damascene teaches that”the carnal man cannot look at the light of truth.” Thus, the lewd and voluptuous no longer understand what is meant by the grace of God, by judgment, hell, and eternity. ”Fire hath fallen upon them, and they shall not see the sun.” (Ps. Ivii. 9.) Some of these blind miscreants go so far as to say, that fornication is not in itself sinful. They say, that it was not forbidden in the Old Law; and in support of this execrable doctrine they adduce the words of the Lord to Osee: ”Go, take thee a wife of fornication, and have of her children of fornication.” (Osee i. 2.) In answer I say, that God did not permit Osee to commit fornication; but wished him to take for his wife a woman who had been guilty of fornication: and the children of this marriage were called children of fornication, because the mother had been guilty of that crime. This is, according to St. Jerome, the meaning of the words of the Lord to Osee. ”Ideirco,” says the holy doctor, ”Fornicationis appelandi sunt filii, quod sunt de meretrice generati.” But fornication was always forbidden, under pain of mortal sin, in the Old, as well as in the New Law. St. Paul says: ”No fornicator or unclean, hath inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.” (Eph. v. 5.) Behold the impiety to which the blindness of such sinners carry them! From this blindness it arises, that though they go to the sacraments, their confessions are null for want of true contrition; for how is it possible for them to have true sorrow, when they neither know nor abhor their sins?
7. The vice of impurity also brings with it obstinacy. To conquer temptations, particularly against chastity, continual prayer is necessary. ”Watch ye, and pray, that ye enter not into temptation.” (Mark xiv. 38.) But how will the unchaste, who are always seeking to be tempted, pray to God to deliver them from temptation? They sometimes, as St. Augustine confessed of himself, even abstain from prayer, through fear of being heard and cured of the disease, which they wish to continue. “I feared,” said the saint, “that you would soon hear and heal the disease of concupiscence, which I wished to be satiated, rather than extinguished.” (Conf., lib. 8, cap. vii.) St. Peter calls this vice an unceasing sin. ”Having eyes full of adultery and sin that ceaseth not.” (2 Pet. ii. 14.) Impurity is called an unceasing sin on account of the obstinacy which it induces. Some person addicted to this vice says: I always confess the sin. So much the worse; for since you always relapse into sin, these confessions serve to make you persevere in the sin. The fear of punishment is diminished by saying: I always confess the sin. If you felt that this sin certainly merits hell, you would scarcely say: I will not give it up; I do not care if I am damned. But the devil deceives you. Commit this sin, he says; for you afterwards confess it. But, to make a good confession of your sins, you must have true sorrow of the heart, and a firm purpose to sin no more. Where are this sorrow and this firm purpose of amendment, when you always return to the vomit? If you had had these dispositions, and had received sanctifying grace at your confessions, you should not have relapsed, or at least you should have abstained for a considerable time from relapsing. You have always fallen back into sin in eight or ten days, and perhaps in a shorter time, after confession. What sign is this? It is a sign that you were always in enmity with God. If a sick man instantly vomits the medicine which he takes, it is a sign that his disease is incurable.
8. St. Jerome says, that the vice of impurity, when habitual, will cease when the unhappy man who indulges in it is cast into the fire of hell. ”infernal fire, lust, whose fuel is gluttony, whose sparks are brief conversations, whose end is hell.” The unchaste be come like the vulture that waits to be killed by the fowler, rather than abandon the rottenness of the dead bodies on which it feeds. This is what happened to a young female, who, after having lived in the habit of sin with a young man, fell sick, and appeared to be converted. At the hour of death she asked leave of her confessor to send for the young man, in order to exhort him to change his life at the sight of her death. The confessor very imprudently gave the permission, and taught her what she should say to her accomplice in sin. But listen to what happened. As soon as she saw him, she forgot her promise to the confessor and the exhortation she was to give to the young man. And what did she do? She raised herself up, sat in bed, stretched her arms to him, and said: Friend, I have always loved you, and even now, at the end of my life, I love you: I see that, on your account, I shall go to hell: but I do not care: I am willing, for the love of you, to be damned. After these words she fell back on the bed and expired. These facts are related by Father Segneri (Christ. Istr. Bag., xxiv., n. 10.) Oh! how difficult is it for a person who has contracted a habit of this vice, to amend his life and return sincerely to God! O how difficult is it for him not to terminate this habit in hell, like the unfortunate young woman of whom I have just spoken.
Second Point. Illusion of those who say that God takes pity on this sin
9. The votaries of lust say that God takes pity on this sin; but such is not the language of St. Thomas of Villanova . He says, that in the sacred Scriptures we do not read of any sin so severely chastised as the sin of impurity. ”Luxuriæ facinus præ aliis punitum legimus.” (Serm. iv., Dom. 1, Quadrag.) We find in the Scriptures, that in punishment of this sin, a deluge of fire descended from heaven on four cities, and, in an instant, consumed not only the inhabitants, but even the very stones. “And the Lord rained upon Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven. And he destroyed these cities, and all things that spring from the earth.” (Gen. xix. 24.) St. Peter Damian relates, that a man and a woman who had sinned against impurity, were found burnt and black as a cinder.
10. Salvian writes, that it was in punishment of the sin of impurity that God sent on the earth the universal deluge, which was caused by continued rain for forty days and forty nights. In this deluge the waters rose fifteen cubits above the tops of the highest mountains; and only eight persons along with Noah were saved in the ark. The rest of the inhabitants of the earth, who were more numerous then than at present, were punished with death in chastisement of the vice of impurity. Mark the words of the Lord in speaking of this chastisement which he inflicted on that sin: ”My spirit shall not remain in man for ever; because he is flesh.” (Gen. vi. 3.) “That is,” says Liranus, “too deeply involved in carnal sins.” The Lord added: ”For it repenteth me that I made man.” (Gen. vi. 7.) The indignation of God is not like ours, which clouds the mind, and drives us into excesses: his wrath is a judgment perfectly just and tranquil, by which God punishes and repairs the disorders of sin. But to make us understand the intensity of his hatred for the sin of impurity, he represents himself as if sorry for having created man, who offended him so grievously by this vice. We, at the present day, see more severe temporal punishment inflicted on this than on any other sin. Go into the hospitals, and listen to the shrieks of so many young men, who, in punishment of their impurities, are obliged to submit to the severest treatment and to the most painful operations, and who, if they escape death, are, according to the divine threat, feeble, and subject to the most excruciating pain for the remainder of their lives. ”Thou hast cast me off behind thy back; bear thou also thy wickedness and thy fornications.” (Ezec. xxiii. 35.)
11. St. Remigius writes that, if children.be excepted, the number of adults that are saved is few, on account of the sins of the flesh. ”Exceptis parvulis ex adultis propter vitiam carnis pauci salvantur.” (Apud S. Cypr. de bono pudic.) In conformity with this doctrine, it was revealed to a holy soul, that as pride has filled hell with devils, so impurity fills it with men. (Col., disp. ix., ex. 192.) St. Isidore assigns the reason. He says that there is no vice which so much enslaves men to the devil as impurity. ”Magis per luxuriam, humanum genus subditur diabolo, quam per aliquod aliud.” (S. Isid., lib. 2, c. xxxix.) Hence, St. Augustine says, that with regard to this sin, ”the combat is common and the victory rare.” Hence it is, that on account of this sin hell is filled with souls.
12. All that I have said on this subject has been said, not that any one present, who has been addicted to the vice of impurity, may be driven to despair, but that such persons may be cured. Let us, then, come to the remedies. These are two great remedies prayer, and the flight of dangerous occasions. Prayer, says St. Gregory of Nyssa, is the safeguard of chastity. “Oratio pudicitiæ præsidium et tutamen est.” (De Orat.) And before him, Solomon, speaking of himself, said the same. “And as I knew that I could not otherwise be continent, except God gave it… I went to the Lord, and besought him.” (Wis. viii. 21.) Thus, it is impossible for us to conquer this vice without God’s assistance. Hence, as soon as temptation against chastity presents itself, the remedy is, to turn instantly to God for help, and to repeat several times the most holy names of Jesus and Mary, which have a special virtue to banish bad thoughts of that kind. I have said immediately, without listening to, or beginning to argue with the temptation. When a bad thought occurs to the mind, it is necessary to shake it off instantly, as you would a spark that flies from the fire, and instantly to invoke aid from Jesus and Mary.
13. As to the flight of dangerous occasions, St. Philip Neri used to say that cowards that is, they who fly from the occasions gain the victory. Hence you must, in the first place, keep a restraint on the eyes, and must abstain from looking at young females. Otherwise, says St. Thomas, you can scarcely avoid the sin. ”Luxuria vitari vix protest nisi vitatur aspectus mulieris pulchræ.” (S. Thom. 1, 2, qu. 167, a. 2.) Hence Job said: ”I made a covenant with my eyes, that I would not so much as think upon a virgin” (xxxi. 1). He was afraid to look at a virgin; because from looks it is easy to pass to desires, and from desires to acts. St. Francis de Sales used to say, that to look at a woman does not do so much evil as to look at her a second time. If the devil has not gained a victory the first, he will gain the second time. And if it be necessary to abstain from looking at females, it is much more necessary to avoid conversation with them. “Tarry not among women.” (Eccl. xlii. 12.) We should be persuaded that, in avoiding occasions of this sin, no caution can be too great. Hence we must be always fearful, and fly from them. ”A wise man feareth and declineth from evil; a fool is confident.” (Prov. xiv. 16.) A wise man is timid, and flies away; a fool is confident, and falls.
Fr. James Altman is the latest priest to be collared because he spoke the Truth! The Great Apostasy has been polluting the Church for nigh 50 years. Here is his interview with Taylor Marshall.
Part I can be read HERE.
Coronavirus Power Grab
At the beginning of the year, we saw how Coronavirus began to spread throughout China, and then from China to other countries, despite the WHO telling us that Coronavirus couldn't spread from human to human. Then, we watched as doctors cooked numbers, and did all manner of immoral things to frighten entire populations into self-imprisonment in their own homes. These same doctors, we later found out, are tied in one way or another to none other than Bill Gates, who has been planning medical tyranny for some time. We also have video evidence that Dr. Fauci, who is directly in the pocket of Gates, just happened to prophecy that under Trump's administration, a pandemic would occur. How on earth could he possibly have known that, unless it was planned?
Toward the latter half of March, my country, the UK, went into lockdown. We were told that around 1 million Brits would die from Coronavirus. We were told that we just HAD to self-imprison and suicide our economy so that the National Health Service (NHS) wouldn't be overrun. In order to help, the government ordered for the construction of several large hospitals known as "Nightingale Hospitals". In truth, we've had 36,659 deaths in England alone. This figure was 42,000, but a tweak was made to the statistics which meant that the death toll dropped by 5,000 people. The population of just England alone, the largest country within the United Kingdom, is 54 million. 36,659 people out of 54 million is 0.067%.
0.067% of people have died from Coronavirus in England thus far. That tiny percentage is the very number that is frightening the government and people of this Kingdom into complete hysteria. It's like an elephant being scared by a mouse. It's embarrassing.
Incidentally, those Nightingale Hospitals were never used, and our hospitals, rather than overflowing with corona patients, were empty. Major surgeries were delayed or even cancelled because of this Scamdemic. The UK economy tanked by 20%! That's worse that the 2008 Recession in which our economy tanked by 2%.
Fast forward to now, August 2020, and what do we see around the world as well as in the UK? The State of Victoria in Australia has just gone into a second lockdown. The Premier of Victoria, Daniel Andrews, is a leftist fake Catholic who is using the lockdown to feed his hunger for power. The police have the power to just trespass into people's homes to make sure they are obeying the Premier, because, ya know, he's God! Video of people being arrested for breaking his tyrannical mandate are making their rounds on social media.
Germany is now going to jail parents who fail to imprison their children in their rooms if they are ONLY suspected of having Coronavirus.
Here in the UK, the government has granted local city councils the power to DEMOLISH buildings suspected of being too infected with Coronavirus.
In the US, an ethicist has advanced the idea that Americans who don't comply with the Corona Commandments should be drugged with "morality pills". And also the US army is being mobilised for a possible war with China and Russia.
We see everywhere the naked tyranny; the power grab by those elected to power. Clearly, those in power, whether consciously or unconsciously, are bringing about Antichrist and the New World Order.
Ann Barnhardt writes about how a reader of hers was given a face mask by their company and told to wear it when at work. With the mask came a note that says that wearing said mask doesn't protect one from Coronavirus. So the question arises: What's the point in wearing a piece of cloth over your mouth and nose that doesn't do jack-squat? Oh, it couldn't possibly be that the Powers That Be want to use it as a means of controlling people! Oh, no. That's just a crack-pot, tin-foil hat conspiracy theory!!
And, it comes as no surprise to find out that in 2015 a study done by the University of New South Wales found that prolonged wearing of cloth masks increases one's chance of contracting pulmonary staph infections. It comes about because the bacteria one breaths out get trapped in the mask, breed, and then eventually return to the body via the nose and mouth, causing infections.
Thinking that current political-social problems are going to be solved merely by electing the "right" person to government is vain, and stupid. No amount of democracy is going to solve ANY of the underlying problems suffered by the place once known as Christendom. The West is dying because she has completely detached herself from God and from morality. And don't believe any of that crap about "secularism". There is no such thing as secularism. A nation will be ruled over by either God or Satan. And since we have evidently de-throned God from our nations, Satan has entered to fill the void. Satan is now the master of our nations, and what a cruel prince he is. Since the 60's, when the semblance of Christian civilisation were publicly thrown off, our societies have collapsed at titanic speeds. Within fifty years, we have gone to accepting every sort of unnatural, perverted and degenerate filth. The family and the sacred institution of marriage created by God for the proper rearing and defence of the family have been completely destroyed. Let me be clear here: there is only one institution on earth that can define marriage and that is the Church. The One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic and Roman Church.
And now, as I predicted at least to myself for many years, the "LGBT" agenda is pushing open paedophilia with it's filthy motto "love has no age". You just watch. "LGBT" will become "LGBTP".
Lesbian. Gay. Bisexual. Transgender. Paedophile.
And speaking of the rainbow people, did you know that the "Pride" flag originally had eight colours. They represent various aspects of the LGBT community. The colour blue, for example, represented magic. Now, why on earth would the so-called "Pride Flag" have a colour to represent magic? Maybe because magic and sexual immorality go together like an Englishman and a cup of tea. The colour blue is still on the flag, incidentally.
My friends, these agendas are all different fronts for Satan to destroy society. Ever wondered why the "LGBT" people align themselves with Islam, a religious-political system that actually murders certain people who engage in sodomy? Why Feminists praise Islam, which in turn oppresses Muslim women in the Middle East and elsewhere? It's a case of the serpent eating its own tail. We see now a war between the Feminists and the Transgenders over women's sports. Women's sports are now being overrun by Transgender women (i.e. biological men who imagine they are women) and are, naturally, beating the biological women since they are, on average, faster and stronger in these sports than the women. Feminists for decades sought to denigrate men, and are themselves now facing the same tactics by another leftists movement.
The United States
And of course we have the Black Lives Matter and other Leftist anarchy taking place both in the United States and elsewhere. Using the unjust death of a black man as their cause, these Marxists have launched their Communist propaganda further into US politics than their predecessors, taking the entire Democrat Party along with them. Their Satanic agenda has now become the mainstream politics of the Democrats, as evidenced by the recent Democrat National Convention, in which each speaker waxed tedious with anti-American agitprop, in boring tones that even Democrats were wont to avoid. The DNC garnered less viewers than America's Got Talent!
One of the main policies now endorsed by the Democrats is the abolition of the US police force. What makes this policy not only dangerous but, ironically, racist is that the people most affected by the loss of policing will be the black population of the US. Since, as we all know, the black community suffers from high rates of black-on-black crime (a result of Democrat policies), black Americans are less likely to want the very people they depend on to bring law and order to their streets, namely the police, to be abolished. And if the police were abolished, crime in black communities will sky-rocket, like they did in the CHOP zone of Seattle and other places. These Democrat places saw crime rise by a percentage in the hundreds.
The Democrat Party, for those who don't know, opposed the emancipation of slaves and ruled over the Slave States of the South. When Lincoln was elected, they began ceding from the Union, creating the Confederacy, with the Democrat Vice-President of the Confederate States stating that the Confederacy was founded "upon the great truth, that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery—subordination to the superior race—is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth." When slavery was abolished, the Democrat run South then introduced the infamous Jim Crow laws. The Ku Klux Klan was founded by six former Confederate Soldiers after the Civil War. It was endorsed by the Democrat Party and sought to overthrow Republican legislatures in the South, as well as targeting other persons, including Catholics. The anti-Catholicism of the KKK came about because it was rooted firmly in Protestantism, and saw the Catholic Church as an enemy. This thought was normal for 19th century Americans, who generally saw the Church as trying to take over the US, with Pope Pius IX seen as the octopus at the centre and, of course, the Jesuits as being his agents. Even though the First Amendment guaranteed religious freedom, Catholics were directly persecuted in America, both before and after the founding of the United States. Catholics couldn't hold public office until the beginning of the 20th Century, and even today there is still anti-Catholic sentiment resident in the American psyche, but that's a story for another day.
The KKK acted as a terror organisation, using violence to silence opponents, even killing people. Sound familiar? Yep, the Democrats are up to their old antics with Antifa, BLM and other radical leftist terror groups. And isn't it funny how all these groups have one particular community at the centre of their ideologies: the black community. Funny that! Later incarnations of the Klan included both Democrats and Republicans as its ideology evolved.
The United Kingdom
Over here in the UK, there has been a slow clamp down on anything deemed too patriotic. Want to wave a St. George's Flag? Well, that's racist. Want to celebrate St. George's Day? That's racist. Funny, St. George, the Patron Saint of England, isn't even English. He was a Syrian who became a Roman soldier, who then was martyred for being a Christian. But, naturally, facts don't matter to a person who cannot process information.
Now, we have been informed that the BBC Proms - a series of musical events that takes place every year in London, culminating in the Last Night of the Proms which is a night of singing patriotic British songs - will be banning Land of Hope and Glory and Rule Britannia. Singing of the glories of one's nation is apparently racist. Singing a song about how the British people will not be slaves is evil. As a proud Englishmen, I am disgusted by this hatred of British culture and history. If these people don't like this nation, why don't they bugger off somewhere else? Europe, perhaps, since they love it so much!
And of course the Empire is brought into derision by self-hating leftist Britons, who see it as the devil incarnate. This tiny island nation built the largest navy in the world, and then constructed the largest empire in world history. Yes, crimes were committed by certain men in the name of the Empire, but that doesn't mean the Empire itself was evil. Every nation, every empire has had crimes committed against its own people in the name of it. Does that invalidate every civilisation in the history of the world? And what about crimes still be perpetrated by African dictators on their own peoples? We all know the answer. African dictators get a free pass because they aren't white. We all see the open racism here.
I could write endlessly about British history and culture, but I'll refrain from doing so here. Instead, let me bring this post to a close by saying that the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Twenty is officially an annus horriblis. Only God knows what is to become of the rest of the year, of the immediate future. In that mind, let us raise our voices in supplication that the Good God will be merciful to His faithful as He permits them to traverse through this veil of tears, scarred by the world, the flesh and the Devil. And may the stripes they earn be not to their shame, but for the glory of Christ Crucified and the Mother of the Crucified, Who alone have triumphed over the Enemy of salvation, and Who alone have lay waste to the Empire of Hell. And may Christ our King and Mary our Queen, reigning in glorious splendour, deign to condescend to us poor sinners who turn to Them in honourable trust and confidence, knowing that all who call upon the Name of the Lord and of His Mother shall be saved. Amen - So be it!
In the following dialogue, C stands for Catholic and P stands for Protestant.
C: You believe that the Bible is the inspired, inerrant, infallible word of God, right?
C: Are you infallible?
C: Is the church you belong to infallible?
C: Is your minister infallible?
C: Is anyone infallible?
P: Outside of Jesus Christ, no.
C: So, let me get this right. You believe the Bible is the infallible word of God, but that no one is infallible?
P: Yes, that's right.
C: So, you believe that God gave us an infallible book but left no infallible person or institution that could infallibly interpret that book, so that we would be certain of what exactly God is saying to us?
C: This is the logical conclusion of your Sola Scriptura belief, that God is an idiot for leaving us an infallible book but no infallible interpreter of that book. Thus, according to that doctrine, no man could ever be certain that his interpretation of Scripture is the right one, or that his interpretation came by the Holy Spirit. Naturally, we see the logical and physical consequence of Sola Scriptura: countless denominations all equally claiming to be based on the same Bible. Are there hundreds of different ways of interpreting Scripture? If there is, then the Holy Spirit would be stupid, and that is a opinion that is offensive to Divine and Catholic Faith. On the contrary, there is indeed an infallible interpreter established by Jesus Christ to give us the true interpretation of Scripture and which can, with absolute certainty, inform us not only the mind of the human authors of Scripture, but the very Mind of God Himself of the same, and that infallible interpreter is none other than the Catholic Church. Thus, the doctrine of Sola Scriptura, whilst being anti-Scriptural, is also illogical, because it would mean that the Bible, given to men for their instruction, is unknowable and forever out of the reach of the human mind. Hence, God is made into an idiot for having left us with so precious a gift, and no one to open it for us.
Ann Barnhardt had linked to a very interesting article on face masks. I, naturally, read it and absorbed its information. I then saw a link to another article on the same site with more information, which I then absorbed as well.
Not wishing to starve you of brain food, here are the links to the said articles. Bon appetite!
NB: I am posting here another article from Ann Barnhardt. The original has several videos. St. Mark
(This was originally penned and posted over three years ago in June of ARSH 2017. Be sure to add “CORONA COLD GHIRA”, “KAREN GHIRA” and “FACE DIAPER GHIRA” to the list.)
The subtitle of my Diabolical Narcissism video presentation is, “The Overarching Global Pathology”. This is why we see points of nexus between all evil paradigms at work today, the same bag of tricks with slightly different masks. Soros-NewWorldOrder-Social Justice Warriorism, Marxism, Islam, Bergoglianism, sodomitism – all of these paradigms and systems have at their foundation Diabolical Narcissism, the freely-chosen purging of all love from the human heart.
I recently came upon a new term from the musloid lexicon, and it needs to be added to the broad lexicon because it is all around us, and thus extremely useful as a concept. The word is: GHIRA.
GHIRA IS A DISPLAY OF RAGE IN THE FACE OF LOGICAL ARGUMENT.The purging of love inevitably yields a hatred of truth. Satan is a liar and the father of lies because God is Himself Truth, and thus satan, in his warped desire to be God, and resulting hatred of God, can only ever pervert truth in an effort to lead others away from God, and into eternal hell with satan himself.
If you have ever been the object of a Diabolical Narcissist’s rage, you will recognize this dynamic almost immediately. DNs cannot stand any confrontation, criticism, or correction when they are demonstrated to be in error. They will rage at anyone they perceive to be a threat, with the level of rage escalating in proportion to the logic of the argument that they are confronted with. You know you have a DN intellectually pinned when all they can do is scream obscenities at you.
This is also why DNs generally surround themselves with people that either are genuinely dumb, or people the DN perceives to be dumb. Have you ever known someone that would openly lecture or berate their “friends”, family or employees for being “f***ing stupid”? Have you ever been mystified by a person who seemed to be extremely intelligent, but would only surround himself with people who were beneath his intellectual level, thus ensuring his dominance, and would actively drive out anyone of any intellectual gravitas, with the only possible exception being a specific Alpha Psychopath above him to which the DN was politically, commercially or socially attached?
Narcissistic raging in the face of logical argument and confrontation.
Every Trad Catholic reading this is now saying, “Oh my gosh, THAT’S BERGOGLIO AND THE DUBIA BROTHERS!”
Um, yeah. Totally.
Antipope Bergoglio is a raging psychopath DN. And when we say “raging”, we aren’t kidding. I have recounted in this space several times the instance at the Luxury Hotel Casa Santa Marta that Bergoglio lives in at the Vatican that the dining hall had to be cleared by the Swiss Guards one day in ARSH 2014 at lunch because Antipope Bergoglio, after having been “challenged” by some public remark affirming Catholic teaching by a Cardinal, was literally bellowing in rage, screaming, “I’M IN CHARGE HERE! I’LL TAKE THEIR HATS! IF THEY DON’T LIKE IT, THEY CAN LEAVE (the Church)!!”
There is also talk in Rome that Antipope Bergoglio’s foul mouth and raging tirades have become continually worse – more foul, more obscene, more profane, as time goes on. This is exactly zero surprise.
This narcissistic raging in the face of logical argument, of which the PERFECT example is the Dubia, because the five Dubia questions are simple, stone-cold logic, either yes, or no, true, or false, is GHIRA.
The Social Justice Warrior raging is GHIRA. The more you confront SJWs with the illogic and irrationality of their arguments and positions, the more they rage – and make no mistake, that rage WILL TURN VIOLENT, as in the French Revolution.
The islamic political system is illogical and irrational from top to bottom – which is why the only thing musloids can do is rage. This is why the islamic political system spreads by essentially one means: violent coercion. Not only is there no logic, but logic is hated and despised within islam and even islamic “theology”. Did you know that the islamic political system claims that the deity “allah” is devoid of logic and reason – that “allah” is pure will and thus can change 180 degrees on a dime with zero concern for any internal consistency? I’m not kidding. Remember that the next time you hear Antipope Bergoglio or some other Commie-faggot heretic bleating about how Christians and musloids “worship the same god”.
Marxism has traditionally purged the academics AFTER the Marxist revolution has been accomplished and the academics (after having acted as useful idiots) are no longer of use. Why? Because the Marxists fear that the academics would at least have the intellectual capacity to recognize and call out the failure, hypocrisy and illogic of the Marxist oligarchs. For a current example see Venezuela, Cuba or Argentina. Or, the total failure of “ObamaCare” (which is intentional). Or the failure of black inner-cities and their kleptocracies such as Chicago, New Orleans or Detroit.
Sodomites, their sexual perversion being derivative of their Diabolical Narcissism, have the highest rates of emotional abuse and domestic violence by a long shot. Ask any cop – fags and dykes are CONSTANTLY beating the crap out of each other. Why? GHIRA. Narcissistic raging, particularly when confronted or challenged. And this is why sodomites, when they come to power over large groups, are spectacularly cruel and hyper-violent. Don’t let the “sissy queeny faggot” facade fool you. And remember that when you see people being horrifically tortured under political oppression or war, dollars to doughnuts says there is a faggot or some other manner of sex pervert calling the shots.
GHIRA IS A DISPLAY OF RAGE IN THE FACE OF LOGICAL ARGUMENT.Spread the term around, keep an eye out for it, and call it out when you see it.
NB: Originally published in March 2018.
A look into the Clergy Sex Abuse Scandal!
In my first Commentary here on the Blog, I want to give a commentary on a subject that is very sensitive to the Church at this moment. A subject that we are all too familiar with, no thanks to the constant media coverage of it, usually distorted or twisted to fit their own narrative, i.e. what they now call fake news.
Over the past week or so I have been reading various articles on Church Militant regarding the outbreak of sex abuse scandals that have erupted out of the US Diocese of Saginaw. I believe that I have linked to practically every one of the articles on the Catholic News Page. If I haven't, Church Militant has a list of links.
The scandal has been made worse by the fact that the bishop of the diocese, Bp. Joseph Cistone, has been covering up the abuse, is not co-operating with civil authorities and has a record of destroying evidence incriminating abusive clerics. Subsequently, the bishop's residence was raided on Thurs. 22 March, as well as diocesan offices.
The eruption of these scandals in Saginaw are but a symptom, a microcosm, of a systemic, universal problem that has been slowly burrowing again into the Church's woodwork. This problem is not new, and is something that the most renowned Benedictine monk, Cardinal and Doctor of the Church St. Peter Damian fought against in the 11th Century, writing his famous Book of Gomorrah to the Roman Pontiff, St. Leo IX, to complain about it. Fortunately for him, something was done about it, since the Pope respected the wisdom of St. Peter Damian and was his friend. The Book is the most extensive treatment and condemnation of clerical homosexuality and pederasty by any authority in the Church. He also loudly condemned the cover up of these sexual crimes by bishops and other superiors. Beginning to sound familiar?
The problem that we call the Clergy Sex Abuse Scandal is not what we have been led to believe by the Mainstream Media, who are no friend of the Catholic Church, and who have now been exposed for being nothing more than propaganda machines for the Left and their agenda. So, it should come as no surprise that the Sex Abuse Scandal in the Church is not for the most part, contrary to the MSM narrative, a paedophilia problem.
Church Militant has reported that the USCCB (United States Conference of Catholic Bishops) in its official reports for 2015 and 2016 have admitted that the vast majority, around 81%, of sex abuse victims are male, and the majority of them are post-pubescent, that is, of teen age. It is most likely, nay certain, that the USCCB report for 2017 will show similar statistics. These figures are, no doubt, representative of other national Catholic Churches.
What this shows is that is that the clergy is suffering not from a paedophile problem, but ephebophilia or pederasty, as it was in the days of St. Peter Damian. And couple that with the fact that most victims are male, and you have homosexual pederasty. Three guesses as to why the MSM won't report that too loudly?!
This revelation flies in the face of the LGBT lobby in the Church who are pushing for the Church to officially embrace homosexuality. How can Catholics be "tolerant" of the very men who are abusing their sons behind closed doors? And then how can we be surprised that the Church officially bars homosexual men from the Priesthood? Their exclusion is not only for the safety of the Church, but of the individual himself. To put an active homosexual in Orders amongst other men and boys, is like putting a chocolate addict in a room full of chocolate. The temptation would be too much, and such temptation was presented to them by someone who should have known better. Thus, the Church bars homosexuals from the Priesthood in order to keep them from temptation, and from a situation which would be made even worse by the fact that they would be wearing a Roman collar! It is really a mercy of the Church to protect men from such a situation and not endanger them or those around them.
Naturally, though, rather than deal with the problem head on, the LGBT lobby will just object that publishing such facts and barring such men from the Priesthood for their own safety is "homophobic", "intolerant" and "hateful". It is no different to the reaction when one points out the obvious violence commanded by the Quran. Rather than face the problem, the immediate reaction is to demonise the offending party, because, apparently, if you don't talk about it, it will either go away by itself, or it will make the blinding problem non-existent.
What also exacerbates the hard situation of dealing with this problem is the reaction of the LGBT community. Their reaction to these facts as described above is a symptom of a false understanding of the Church's teaching on homosexuality, or else just flat out hatred of the Church. Like rebellious teenagers, the LGBT community complain that Mother is being restrictive and controlling because She won't allow them to live a life not only contrary to moral law, but contrary to one's own health. They thus paint an image of the Church as a evil witch, and then come to hate their own false image of the Church, believing it to be the real image. Those who have pure hatred for the Church cannot be helped without extraordinary grace from God; those who are just simply misguided can be helped, if they want to be helped. Another exacerbation of the situation is when clerics begin to accept these false images of the Church as homophobic etc., and then actively promote the LGBT narrative of calling for the Church to change Her divine teachings on this subject. Such clerics show by their actions that they didn't understand the Church's teaching in the first place; if they did, they clearly dissented from it.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, contrary to most beliefs I suspect, presents very little on the subject of homosexuality [#2357-2359]. The reason being is that She isn't some hateful, intolerant witch! Her response to the homosexual lifestyle is that whilst homosexual tendencies aren't sinful in themselves, they are disordered, whilst homosexual acts, such as sexual intercourse between two men, is intrinsically evil; that is, it is evil always and everywhere in every circumstance. However, the Church does not hate homosexuals, but rather loves them; so much so that She teaches us to accept them with respect, compassion and sensitivity.
Contrary to popular belief, neither the Church nor any of Her faithful can judge people; that is a property of God alone. Only He can judge why a person is behaving in such a manner. Perhaps they were sexually abused by a man and thus became confused about themselves; perhaps they are seeking a father figure in other men because they didn't have a responsible father in their lives; maybe they had a radical feminist for a mother who's constant demonising of men created a fear in the young man that he won't be loved by his mother if he became too masculine. They are a number of reasons why such men become homosexual. Because we don't know, at least at first contact, why a particular man is homosexual we cannot judge the man himself.
However, we can tell him that his actions are contrary to moral law, and that he needs to cease his behaviour, turn to God, be contrite for what he has done, go to sacramental confession, and be released from his sins. After this, he needs to be guided by the Church to work out who he is, why he feels the way he does, and receive proper counselling and support. A well-known ministry that helps men with same-sex attraction is Courage. They help men and women with same-sex attraction learn to control their passions, and live chaste, holy and happy lives in conformity with Christ and His Church. Doing so, they are freed from the identity politics of their active peers in the LGBT community. Their banner becomes the Cross, and not some twisted version of the rainbow. Their disordered feelings are directed to ordered love for God and His Church. God has allowed such people to carry a heavy cross; usually to make them better saints and examples of His love and mercy. Such crosses are a time of trial for such people, and we should be their Simon of Cyrene's, helping them to carry their cross, not telling them to let their cross crush them down.
However, acceptance with respect, compassion and sensitivity does not negate the Church's teaching from being taught correctly. It does not mean compromising the teachings of the Church like the infamous Fr. James Martin, SJ. has been doing. The Church's teachings can, and must, still be taught properly, correctly and inviolate. But it should be taught with charity.
Yet, such behaviour amongst the clergy must be punished. St. Peter Damian's list of punishments included public beatings, imprisonment in a monastery for the rest of one's life with constant surveillance, three days of fasting and the like. To us that would seem extreme, however such treatment is meant to wear down the man, thereby making him less likely to want to sodomise someone. Now, just imagine if something like that was in force today. Imagine going to your local Cathedral on a Friday, and witnessing a group of monks flogging an abusive cleric. That would send a signal to the Church: we do not tolerate such behaviour. Imagine a public defrocking of a sexually abusive cleric in full view of the faithful. This would give the faithful a clear imagine of the Church doing its job: safeguarding the faithful from evil men. Sadly, the reality is that the Church isn't just to do something, She must be seen to be doing it. She must be the leader of reform within Her ranks, if She ever wishes to reform the world. What a scandal it is for the Church to preach purity, when Her own clerics are impure! The problems of the world are just an outward manifestation of the crisis in the Church.
Yet, many will object to using such treatment today. It is too medieval. It is too brutal. It lacks charity. Regardless of your opinions on such treatment, I think we all agree that something has to be done. And the Church shouldn't be doing it for the sake of virtual-signalling, but actually doing something, sweeping the floor, scrubbing the woodwork, dusting the shelves. And this reform must begin in Rome, which is infamous with being stuffed with homosexual clergy. The very See of Peter is the centre of this filth! The Holy Father needs to make an example of these men, and show the world that he is doing something within his very diocese. Then, he must expand this reform to the rest of the Universal Church.
And how should this reform come about? Only with strict procedures, tough love and elbow grease. At present, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (formerly called the Roman Inquisition) is the Congregation in charge of prosecuting sexually abusive clerics (traditionally called heretical depravity), whilst the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors is the Commission in charge of advising the Roman Pontiff on how he is to go about protecting minors, and also uniting their efforts with the aforementioned Congregation. One can read about the Commission for Minors on the website.
This Commission was set up in 2014, and then lapsed around the end of 2017, but not without going through some scandals on the way! Several members left the Commission over claims that nothing was being implemented to safeguard minors in the Church. So, the Commission got off to a bumpy start. However, in Feb. 2018, Pope Francis restarted the Commission, expanding its membership. Let us pray they actually do something this time!
Commissions are all well and good, but what good are they if they are not accompanied with proper strict procedures? Whilst many may think that the public whipping of clerics may be a step too far, they would at least agree, I hope, that abusive clerics should be removed from active ministry, or even removed from the priesthood entirely. Criminal clerics naturally deserve imprisonment, whilst other clerics who engage in non-criminal sexual activity deserve some form of punishment for breaking their celibacy, and for their heretical depravity.
One can speculate on what punishments should be enforced. I think perhaps taking St. Peter Damian's suggestions would be a good start. Yes, I know, flogging may seem too harsh, or too medieval, but we are talking about sexual abusive/active clerics! At the least, they need to be publicly shamed for their crime, and then put into a regime of penance.
I think also that St. Leo IX's stance could be adopted:
1) Those who, of their own free will, have for a short time, but not with many others, practised solitary or mutual masturbation or who have engaged in interfemoral coitus (masturbation by stimulating the genitalia against the thigh of a partner) shall retain their status, after having "curbed their desires" and "atoned for their infamous deeds with proper repentance".
2) Those who, for a long time, or a short time with many, have engaged in the above, or have engaged in anal intercourse, are to be entirely removed from office.
I suppose there are many suggestions that could be put forward, the which would make this post rather voluminous! Perhaps a Part II is in order - but not just yet! I think I need a break from writing about this subject, and wash my brain out with something else!
To finish off, I would direct my reader to the Fisheaters website, which has a page on the Clergy Sexual Abuse. I would also proffer to the reader this Constitution of Pope Benedict XIV, who speaks on clerical sex abuse (thus reminding us this is no new thing!). The first part of the Constitution is the Latin text, whereas the English text is underneath.
I pray the above prattle is an insight into what is really happening. And for St. Peter's sake: DON'T LISTEN TO THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA! They are run by the Father of lies, hence why they are pushing fake news all over the place, and why they so hate the Church.
It is most providential that the Holy Father has instituted a new feast. This new feast, called Mary, Mother of the Church, will be celebrated yearly on the Monday following Pentecost Sunday. It reminds us that Our Lady is the Mother of the Church, since the Church is the Mystical Body of Christ, and Mary is the Mother of Christ. She is our caring Mother, and I think we need to start to begin a deep devotion to Her under this title. Perhaps, I could create a page with various improvised prayers to Her for your consideration! At least, I would doing what I preach (for once!).
May Almighty God through the intercession of St. Mark keep you all unto eternal life!
Infowars have received internal documents that are being sent to the States in which is shown that if one person has ANY symptom the Medical Elite claim is COVID, then that person is marked down as being COVID-positive (even if they haven't actually had a test) and 15 people around them will also be automatically marked down as COVID-positive as well.
Folks, they are cooking the numbers and have been since day one. This whole thing is a giant fraud.
If you can't see the play button on the video below, right click on the image below and press play. If that doesn't work, you can see the video HERE.
Today, 29th June, is the Solemnity of SS. Peter and Paul. We celebrate not only their feast, but also the birthday of the Holy Roman Church, which together they founded by their word, the works, and by their blood.
St. Peter, who is also known as Simon, was the son of John of Bethsaida. Together with his brother, St. Andrew the Apostle, St. Peter was a fisherman (probably illiterate) who spent his days in his boat with his father and brother on the Sea of Galilee. When Our Lord called him and his brother, they left their nets and boats, and were joined to the Apostolic College. At Caesarea Philippi, Our Lord promised to build the Church on St. Peter and to give him supreme authority over the whole Church. During his life, St. Peter was often rash and quick to act and speak, which often led him to trouble. At the Passion of Our Lord, as Christ had prophesied, the Apostle thrice denied the Saviour, for which he bitterly repented and wept over. According to tradition, his cheeks forever bore the signs of his prolonged weeping. Later on, after His Resurrection, Christ conferred His Authority upon St. Peter, and made him His Vicar on earth and the Prince of the Apostles. St. Peter first fixed his See at Antioch, before transferring it and fixing it at Rome, becoming her first Bishop. He spent 25 years in Rome, founding the Roman Church and preaching the Gospel. Two of his Epistles were joined to the Canon of Scripture. He was sentenced to death by crucifixion by the Emperor Nero. He was led to the Circus Nero, located outside the ancient city walls on Vatican Hill, and at his request he was crucified upside down, since he felt unworthy to die in the same manner as his Master. His blood consecrated the City of Rome to the Lord, and made her the spiritual capital of the world. His body was later buried on Vatican Hill, over which, in the 4th Century, Constantine the Great would later build a great Basilica in Peter's honour. This ancient structure stood until the 16th Century when, due to its great age, it was pulled down and replaced by the current St. Peter's Basilica in Vatican City. St. Peter's relics rest under the Basilica, so that the words of Our Lord would be literally fulfilled, namely, that upon Peter the Church would be built. His physical appearance is described as having: a strong, roundish head, prominent jaw-bones, a receding forehead, thick, curly hair and beard.
St. Paul began life as Saul of Tarsus, a city in Asia Minor (Turkey). He was schooled in the Pharasaical tradition, and became somewhat a fanatic. This led him to heavily, and violently, persecuted the Early Church. He was present at the stoning of the Church's first martyr, St. Stephen. He made a name for himself hunting Christians. Whilst travelling on the road to Damascus, again to persecute Christians, the Lord appeared to him to end Saul's persecution. This encounter with Christ led Saul to convert to the Catholic Faith. He fled into the Arabian desert for many years, after which he returned to Jerusalem to see St. Peter. He recounted his story to Peter, who no doubt baptised Saul, and then conferred priestly and episcopal authority on Saul, and grafted into the Apostolic College. Saul later changed his name to Paul, since his principal missions were to the Greek speaking Gentiles of the East. He established many Sees in the East, many of which still exist today. Fourteen of his Epistles were added to the Canon of Scripture by the Church. He was many times persecuted by both pagan and Jewish authorities. Although he was a prolific preacher of the Faith, he is believed to not have been a good public orator for whatever reason. he later removed himself to Rome, to join St. Peter in building up the Roman Church. Whilst there, Paul was imprisoned several times. Eventually, like St. Peter, Paul was condemned to death by Nero. Since he was a Roman citizen, he would be beheaded. According to tradition, Peter and Paul embraced each other and blessed one another when the day of their executions came round. Though they had often disagreed with one another, yet they embraced one another a most beloved brothers in Christ. Whilst Peter was sent off to Vatican Hill to be crucified, Paul to taken to another place and beheaded. His body was moved two miles from the execution site and buried. Later, Constantine the Great erected a Church over the site, and this was enlarged by Emperor Theodosius I. It stands today and is known as St. Paul Outside the Walls. St. Paul is described by the Catholic Encyclopaedia as: short of stature; the Pseudo-Chrysostom calls him "the man of three cubits" (anthropos tripechys) [or four foot six inches, a small man indeed!]; he was broad-shouldered, somewhat bald, with slightly aquiline nose, closely-knit eyebrows, thick, greyish beard, fair complexion, and a pleasing and affable manner. He was afflicted with a malady which is difficult to diagnose (cf. Menzies, "St. Paul's Infirmity" in the Expository Times", July and Sept., 1904), but despite this painful and humiliating infirmity (II Cor., xii, 7-9; Gal., iv, 13-14) and although his bearing was not impressive (II Cor., x, 10), Paul must undoubtedly have been possessed of great physical strength to have sustained so long such superhuman labours (II Cor., xi, 23-29). Pseudo-Chrysostom, "In princip. apostol. Petrum et Paulum" (in P. G., LIX, 494-95), considers that he died at the age of sixty-eight after having served the Lord for thirty-five years.
May SS. Peter and Paul, glorious Princes of the Apostles, intercede for Holy Mother Church at this time when She is so assailed by the powers of Hell. May they secure for Her liberty and salvation, and may their voices once more ring out from Rome to enlighten the hearts and minds of ignorant men.
Ss. Peter and Paul, pray for us!
I've created an account on Parler, the free-speech alternative to Twitter. I've never used Twitter, and don't WANT to use it.
Please follow me here: https://parler.com/profile/StMark/posts
Paul Joseph Watson over at Infowars is reporting that the white liberals of the Capitol Hill Organised Protest (CHOP; formerly known as CHAZ) zone, the hell-hole set up in the midst of Seattle, are enforcing a segregated park for black people only. One quote in the short article says: “Segregation is back in vogue. CHAZ/CHOP establishes “black only” spaces. It’s like Jim Crow all over again except it’s woke to be racist and corporations throw billions of dollars at you.”
Segregation is back in vogue. It's woke to be racist.
And we already have secession going on in Seattle like the good old days of the Confederacy (run by Democrats, incidentally)! This is the American Civil War, 2.0.
But, it's always been vogue and woke to be racist for Democrats. Jim Crow Laws, anyone?
Even Wikipedia, which has been scrubbing any truth from its pages, admits in the first two sentences in its article on Jim Crow Laws:
Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States. All were enacted in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by white Democratic-dominated state legislatures to disenfranchise and remove political and economic gains made by blacks during the Reconstruction period.
It later goes on to blatantly state:
In the 1870s, Democrats gradually regained power in the Southern legislatures, after having used insurgent paramilitary groups, such as the White League and the Red Shirts, to disrupt Republican organizing, run Republican officeholders out of town, and intimidate blacks to suppress their voting. Extensive voter fraud was also used. In one instance, an outright coup or insurrection in coastal North Carolina led to the violent removal of democratically elected non-Democratic party executive and representative officials, who were either hunted down or hounded out. Gubernatorial elections were close and had been disputed in Louisiana for years, with increasing violence against blacks during campaigns from 1868 onward.
Sound familiar? Paramilitary groups, the colours white and red, intimidation, suppression of black people, voter fraud, insurrection, violent removals....That sounds an awful lot like Antifa/BLM, the white liberals who run them sporting red Commie paraphernalia, using violence to intimidate, and then causing insurrection by establishing CHAZ/CHOP/COMMIE-CENTRAL in the middle of Seattle, doesn't it?
Something about history repeating itself comes to mind....
Mmm, it's couldn't be that the Democrat Party is doing today what its always been doing! Surely not!
Remember, when Joe Biden says that you can't be black if you don't vote for him, he's only expressing true Democrat values. And I wonder how long it will take for him to quote Alexander H. Stephens, the Vice President of the Confederacy, when he famously said: Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.
And so you can see that I am not lying, I've highlighted the text of the Wikipedia article I quoted above:
#BlackLivesMatter....but only those who live in the First World and have more privilege than any black African could possibly dream of
9 million Africans are still enslaved.
But you won't hear a blessed word from #BlackLivesMatter or any Leftist Fake News. It seems that the only black lives that really matter are the privileged, First World black lives of the prosperous and wealthy West. Sod the black lives that live in the Third World, right?
Maybe a new hashtag could be #SlaveLivesMatter. But, it'll probably be banned by Social Media for being racist or some such nonsense. As I stated in my previous post, white slavery is a thing.
Since the tragic death of George Floyd in the US, the subject of black oppression and historical slavery of black people has once again been brought up. But, as usual, emotions get in the way of truth. And because the narrative is being driven by a particular viewpoint, the cold, hard and uncomfortable truths about slavery are suppressed.
So let us take a brief look at these hard truths. Ready? These come in no particular order:
1) Slavery is as old as the human race. Men have been enslaving other men for centuries. Every civilisation used slavery as a form of labour. All the ancient empires used slavery. It's a fact of life. And another factoid is that slavery still exists today around Africa. In Niger, for example, Wikipedia states: Slavery continues to exist in Niger today. The most significant survey of slavery in Niger identified 11,000 respondents throughout the country who were identified as being slaves. Using further responses from these a partial sample revealed 43,000 slaves. Further extrapolating from this information, and including the children of slaves, the anti-slavery organization Timidria estimated a possible total of 870,363 slaves (both chattel slaves and passive slaves) in Niger in 2002–2003.
2) The word "slave" is interesting. Why? Because it comes from the ethnonym slav, in reference to the Slavic peoples of Eastern Europe. In the Early Middle Ages, the Moors who conquered Iberia travelled to Eastern Europe in order to capture and sell Slavs into slavery. Did you get that? Black African/Arab Muslims enslaved white, Christian, Europeans. And the Slavs weren't the only Europeans to made into slaves. The Christians of Iberia were turned into slaves, and the beautiful women amongst them were carted off to become the concubine of some far off Muslim prince. So, the word slave itself is derived from black-on-white slavery. White slavery is a thing. Again, it doesn't take too much research to find out that even white people were enslaved either by other white people, or by non-white people.
3) Various African nations engaged extensively in slavery for centuries. For example, the Empire of Ethiopia sold its own subjects to Muslim slavers. Ultimately, when the Transatlantic Slave Trade began to take form, the colonialists found their African slaves already enslaved and ready to buy. From whom did they buy these slaves? From the Muslim Arabs and Africans who already had a fruitful supply of slaves from Africa.
4) A big part of African slavery was the emergence and dominance of Islam. Muslim Arabs enslaved the African peoples they conquered, just like they enslaved white Europeans as well. Later, the European colonialists bought slaves from the Arab Slave Trade, and on many occasions actually took over many of these trade routes from the Arabs/African Muslims.
5) A little known fact (and one that will be most embarrassing to our leftists adversaries) is that one of the first cases of legalised slavery in the English colonies of North America involved a black man from Angola (then a colony of the Portuguese Empire). He was captured by the Portuguese, named Anthony, and then sold to a colonist in the Colony of Virginia as a indentured servant. He (together his wife Mary whom he married whilst a servant) was given freedom around 1635, and later became a very prosperous and wealthy man. He was granted land by the said Colony of Virginia, on which he grew tobacco. He owned around 150 acres of land. And who farmed this land for our Anthony? None other than African servants. One such servant, John Casor, was later ordered by the Northampton Court to remain a permanent indentured servant to Anthony, or what we would call a slave. That's right. The first black man to be a legal slave in British North America had a master who was himself an African. Repeat for full retention: a black man was one of the first men in British North America to legally own a slave! So all of you BLM and other liberals can put that in your pipe and smoke it.
6) Those scarfs worn by Democrat politicians in the US are called Kente scarfs. They are the traditional vesture of the Ashanti people of present day Ghana. In times past, they were worn by the royalty of the Ashanti Empire. The background to this Empire is that the Ashanti engaged in slavery. So, the scarfs worn by Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer represent Ashanti royals who sold their own subjects into slavery. Is the donning of this scarf a symbol of how Democrats have, for decades, kept blacks under control, and how even black Democrat politicians sell their own people out for power, money and prestige?
7) A documentary on Britain's role in the slave trade follows three particular white people who have a black slave ancestor, that is, these white English people are directly descended from black slaves. This proves a point: that you don't need to be black to be the descendant of a slave, and that thinking that only black people could ever possibly be the descendants of slaves is, well, racist. And if we're going to pay reparations to the descendants of slaves, these white English people would need to be paid said reparations. And of course, one would possibly find many black people in the West whose ancestors sold other black people into slavery. One can quickly see that the Leftist argument that if you're white you MUST be the descendant of slavers and if you're black you MUST be the descendant of slaves is proved false.
8) The descendants of black slaves who now live in America have a life far better than their ancestors. This is proof that God can draw straight with crooked lines. The movement of black people from Africa to the Colonies has now resulted in Black Americans becoming part of the American Dream. Black Americans (and blacks in the West in general) have access to things that blacks in Africa could only dream of accessing. One would have to ask: if life in the West is so bad for you, why not remove yourself to the land of your ancestors? I think we all know the answer to that question.
9) It's one thing to peacefully protest about real injustices in society, but it's another to bitch about an historical event that cannot be changed. What's done is done, and nothing can change that. You don't see Tunisians complaining about how the Romans 2,000+ years ago destroyed Carthage and enslaved the entire population of the city, do you? Why? Because they're clever enough to know that modern Romans/Italians can't change an event that happened 20 centuries ago. And nothing can change the slave trade.
10) A really dangerous thing for a black man to do is actually act out the racial stereotype that many think him to be. Seeing the videos of black people rioting and looting stores for stupid things like Nike trainers (sneakers) just feeds stereotypes and prejudices that some have against black people. It just makes actual racists solid in their belief that black people are animals who can't be civilised and thus must be pacified, with force even. And frankly, is it sad and tragic to watch black youths cajoled into acting out stereotypes, advised (of course) by white leftists who are (as we have all seen) the biggest racists to walk the face of God's green earth. I mean, if Joe Biden's claim that if you don't vote Democrat then you're not really black isn't as racist as heck, then I don't know what is.
Archbishop Vigano, a man now both famous and infamous depending on which side of the fence you sit on, though in hiding, has refused to stay silent on various pertinent matters, now including the social upheaval caused by both the Plandemic and by the current rioting in the United States, of which he was Apostolic Nuncio under Pope Benedict XVI.
On the Solemnity of the Most Holy Trinity (7 June 2020), the good Archbishop published an open letter to President Trump via LifeSiteNews, essentially warning the President that the civil disturbances being agitated against him since his election and subsequent Inauguration, though brought about by evil men and those under their control, are in truth the machinations of none other than the Father of Lies, the Murderer, the Prince of Darkness, whose children are now everywhere tearing down what remains of Christian civilisation.
In fact, the Archbishop warns the President about the Masonic Latin motto Solve et Coagula, which means to dissolve and bring together. It is a motto tattooed on the arms of the idol of Baphomet, the goat-headed god of witches, which is being installed in various places by Satanists. Dr. Taylor Marshall explains what this motto means in the video below.
Yesterday (Wed 10 June), President Trump retweeted the Archbishop's letter and asked for everyone to read it.
Make no mistake about this. It is all planned. It cannot be ignored that these civil crises come about with efficient regularity, and upon the heels of the previous crises, especially in the United States.
In regards to President Trump, it was the Russia Investigation. And when that turned up nothing, they immediately changed the narrative to Ukraine. That blew up, so they tried Impeachment. When that fell down the hole, then came along COVID-19, which just happened to have been planned back in October 2019 by none other than the Doctor of the Universe, Bill Gates-of-Hell, who, coincy-dinky, already has a patent for a Mark of the Beast style vaccine/chip ready for use on the entire human race in the face of a pandemic. And I'm sure it's also just a coincidence that the very virus used in Gates' pandemic simulation back in October 2019 just happened to be a coronavirus! Still think this is just random?
And now the Corona Spell is wearing off and people are beginning to see the truth - namely, that the Coronavirus is none other than a seasonal cold/flu, and that the people it's killed are the same people who would have been killed by a seasonal cold regardless; that the government's response (egged on by the Scientific Elite, in the control of Lucifer) to literally suicide the economy and cause a depression is as man-made as the Great Depression of the 1930's; that this whole Pandemic was a yet another attempt by Satan and his minions to further usher in the New World Order with its Supreme Dictator - Antichrist.
What's the successor of the Plandemic? Another race war agitated by Black Lives Matter (read: Burn, Loot, Mugg) and Antifa (read: Antifacist But Actually Communist). And I'm sure it's just coincidental that the last major race riot happened in 2016, the year of the last US Presidential Election! I've given a bit of commentary on the whole George Floyd situation, so there is no need to rehearse it here.
Anyone with eyes to see and at least a functioning brain cell can see that nothing I've described above is coincidental. It's all planned and orchestrated by the satellites of Satan. Just as God never stops working in the preservation and governance of the universe, so Satan never stops in his attempt to destroy that same universe. And the bulls-eye on his dartboard is the Catholic Church, with men of good will being fairly close to it. The Church is the really the last man standing. But, he has managed to infiltrate Her as he has done civil society.
Lucifer never forgets the sober truth that many of the Church's hierarchs have: that the Catholic Church IS the protector of true, moral and Christian society. Without Her, the place formerly known as Christendom will slip back into its heathenism. And isn't that what we see today? As the vestiges of Catholicism is shrugged off by society, it becomes corrupt and pagan. What was sacred has been profaned, and what is profane is now sacred. Truths are lies, and lies are the truth. Society is at war with reality itself, and the inability of comprehend and conform oneself to reality is the very definition of insanity. The Prince of this world has quite literally driven society insane.
Whilst Archbishop Vigano is right in saying that the truly evil are a minority compared to those with good will, it is also true to say that the truly evil have complete control over the good willed. At this very moment, the evil have seized control of practically every institution in the West, most especially the education and governmental institutions. With these two under their claws, the seed of Satan have been able to indoctrinate the people of tomorrow and then use them to take over the governments of the West, which in turn impose the Luciferian Agenda on the rest of society.
And here is something that needs to drilled into people, especially Americans: Society is going to keep collapsing. It has too. Otherwise there will be no Antichrist, and the Book of the Apocalypse written by St. John the Apostle will be a lie. It is Divine Providence that society collapses in order for Antichrist to come to power, but in the end, naturally, Almighty God wins. God may permit a plateauing of the collapse, or out of mercy for the just postpone the collapse for a time (and He seems to have done this in the US with President Trump, amongst other nations), but that postponement is only temporary. Neither Trump nor the good that he has managed to do with last forever. Eventually, Americans will have to face the reality that the Constitution that they love so much will become only a memory for those who've read it, and a dream by those who haven't. All of your constitutional rights and freedoms will be taken away from you, as candy is from a naughty child. The Greatest Nation On Earth, will be no more. It will become a province of the Satanic Empire.
And yet, as I said, God permits a delay in the collapse of society for the sake of the just. We may petition Him to withhold His wrath for a time, but eventually the Just Judge will render His verdict. We may plead with Him like our holy father Abraham before the nefarious cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, but the fire of Divine Justice will eventually rain down on society.
As St. Alphonsus Ligouri taught: God's Mercy will end and His Justice will take over. And when that happens, God help you!
Minor Language Alert!!
UPDATE 9 June 2020: Just discovered that the World Health Organisation has already announced that asymptomatic carries of COVID-19 rarely spread the virus. So, the wearing of facial coverings under the pretence that you may be an asymptomatic carrier, and thus inadvertently spread the virus to others, is just Fake News then? Just more bulls**t? Just more proof that this whole scare-mongering was planned? Gotcha.
Annus Horribilis is a Latin term which means horrible year. And that certainly is what 2020 has become.
We are at the half way point of the year, and look at what Anno Domini MMXX has become! We began the year with half the human race scared into self-imprisonment in their homes over a seasonal cold/flu, governments shuttering businesses which has caused the economy to essentially tank and people to lose their jobs, people being told to done a facial covering of any kind which will do nothing to stop them either catching or spreading the virus, and the like.
Now that the Corona Spell is wearing off, people are waking up to the fact that this whole pandemic has been a scam straight from Satan's Big Book of Lies, most especially since a report was leaked from Germany that revealed for all the world to see that, indeed, the Pandemic was completely fabricated.
The money quote:
Some of the report key passages are:
But the Father of Lies isn't finished trying to wreck society. He and his minions have devised another way to destroy the social order: foment anarchy in the streets. And this - like the Pandemic - couldn't be achieved without Satan's useful tool: the Mainstream Media.
Once again, we have a protest-turned-riot in the streets of not only the United States, but even my own country of the United Kingdom, amongst others, over the death of a black man unjustly killed by a policeman, Derek Chauvin. Said black man - one George Floyd - whilst undeserving of being killed by Derek via suffocation from having his airway precluded by the policeman's knee being plunged into his neck, nevertheless is not as innocent as many make him out to be. Mr. Floyd, from what I understand, has a criminal record (even the New York Post reported on it) and was, at the time of his arrest, high on meth and other substances and was in possession of some white powder. Incidentally, Derek Chauvin was known to said Mr. Floyd, and apparently has a case of abusive behaviour. As I understand it, back in the early 2000's, the cop was under investigation for such abuse, but it came to nought. The person in charge of his investigation was none other than the Democrat presidential candidate Amy Klobuchar. Says everything, doesn't it!
And now, the protests against Mr. Floyd's unjust murder have been hijacked - as usual - by Black Lives Matter, whose history stretches back to the Communists of the early 20th Century, and who explicitly want to Communise the West. They are a Communist movement, through and through. They only use their name "Black Lives Matter" as a front. They want total destruction of Western (read: Christian) Civilisation. How is it that a movement supposedly championing black rights want to dismantle "cisgender privilege" and "patriarchal practise", along with "disrupting" the nuclear family and want to free "ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking"? What has that got to do with the death of a black man? Absolutely nothing, whatsoever.
Sadly, Mr. Floyd's death is being used as the catalyst to cause a race war - a move toward Communist Revolution, which in turn will be a facet of the New World Order, which in turn will bring about Antichrist eventually - and the black community in both America, Britain and the rest of the Western World is once again being used as pawns.
The sad truth about "Black America" is that they have never stopped being slaves. Once upon a time, they were put in chains, packed onto ships, and sent off to the Colonies to work on a plantation. When it came for abolition, the Democrat Party opposed it. When it passed, they had to find a new way to keep the black man under their yoke, and so in the 20th Century the same Democrats introduced Jim Crow laws, segregation, the KKK, and one Democrat voter, Margaret Sanger, founded the abortion giant Planned Parenthood. For what reason? She says:
We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.
That's right. Planned Parenthood was founded by a Democrat who wanted to genocide black people. And it's little wonder that even to this very day, there are more Planned Parenthood murder chambers in black neighbourhoods than in white neighbourhoods. But, I'm sure it's just a coincy-dinky, right?!
Thus, the Democrats have moved the black man from the Planation of the Field to the Plantation of the City, wherein they are told to vote Democrat (dare to vote Republican and you're an Uncle Tom), not to marry (since the Government will be your husband and your bread-winner) which creates fatherless homes in which young black men grow up without knowing how live as proper men of society, which in turn causes them to seek out a gang to belong to, thinking this is what a man's identity is. By the time they're 30, they will either have been in prison numerous times or be dead from either being shot by a cop or by another black gangster.
And now we publicly see the truth of Black Lives Matter, funded by the usual suspects (George Soros, et al). They are defacing the monuments of various persons, including that of Sir Winston Churchill in London. They are pillaging various establishments, razing others, and causing absolute mayhem in the streets.
And the effeminate response by the authorities is just telling. Enough with the bulls**t!
Well, enough is enough!
Our countries needs to be re-set, the hard way it seems. These leftists need to be purged from ALL institutions, and permanently dealt with in some manner for crimes against the State. Black Lives Matter and Antifa are nothing other than enemy belligerents of the New World Order and should be treated as such.
We are at war.
And we are losing.
God help us if the latter half of 2020 turns out worse that the earlier half!
Talk about fire of the Holy Spirit!!
How long do you think this priest will last before he is silenced?
The sexualisation of children is a facet of the Satanic Agenda and put into place by Diabolical Narcissists, who, as we know, love to victimise vulnerable people, especially children. The whole sordid business of literally grooming children via pornographic sexual education is meant to turn innocent young people into raging DN's and destroy any morality they have. To teach children about sexual intercourse - and especially the most debased form of it like sodomy - is paedophilia. Full stop. What we have is institutionalised paedophilia. It's sick, twisted, disgusting, odious and perverted to the highest degree.
People who peddle this disgusting raping of children's innocence should be hung, drawn and quartered, or, to follow the example of Christ Himself, have a millstone wrapped about their necks and drowned in the depth of the sea!
Parents fumed as a United Kingdom school set their children inappropriate questions regarding the categorization of certain forms of pornography. Children between the ages of 11-14 were asked to define types of pornography ranging from “soft,” “hardcore,” and even “transsexual” as part of their assignment.
Included in the insensitive work was female genital mutilation, male circumcision, breast ironing, wet dreams, and trafficking, among other controversial themes.
According to the Hull Daily Mail, children in Years 7, 8 and 9 at Archbishop Sentamu Academy in east Hull, Yorkshire, were required to fulfill a homework task involving the explicit content.
Additionally, the children were asked to tackle questions about drinking, smoking, and drug use.
The school since apologized since the homework topics racked up complaints from parents.
A mother, who came forward about the homework, said that if her young daughter had searched for help to complete the homework online, she could have been exposed to age-inappropriate content–causing psychological damage.
The mother said: “My daughter is still very much a child, we’ve still got magic elves, her bedroom is done in My Little Pony. She is very innocent and naïve.
“She was only in primary school last year living her best life, now she is being asked to search for hardcore pornography.
“She’s 11, she should be doing stranger danger, and don’t share your info online, but genital mutilation is another thing. It was asking about male circumcision, breast ironing…I don’t even know what that is myself.”
This is not the first time sexually explicit content has become part of young British students’ curricula.
National File reported on a UK council responsible for a now-defunct online ‘sextionary’ accessible to students involving a list of extreme fetishes and paraphilias, including “felching” and “c**k and ball torture.”
Via National File:
Yet another bizarre story to emerge from the UK involving its hypersexualized curriculum.
Other schools across the UK have come under fire for introducing taboo or adult materials to their students, angering parents.
UN calls for gender-neutral language whilst hypocritically calling one of its entities "UN Women" - a gender-specific name!
The United Nations (aka, the precursor to the New World Order ruled over by Antichrist) is calling for gender-neutral language when referring to certain persons/professions.
In a tweet put out by the UN, it has a list of gender-specific words and their gender-neutral replacements, as seen below:
Ironically, the UN entity that pushed this is none other than the UN Women. The website for UN Women describes itself as:
the United Nations entity dedicated to gender equality and the empowerment of women. A global champion for women and girls, UN Women was established to accelerate progress on meeting their needs worldwide.
I could go into a whole essay about how stupid all this is. The New World Order is pushing its androgyny on society. No one can be anything anymore. We are all to become sterile hermaphrodites, living in Smart Cities with 24/7 surveillance courtesy of Big Tech on behalf of Antichrist, with the Antichurch ruled over by the Antipope (i.e. the False Prophet Forerunner of Antichrist (who may or may not be Bergoglio)) cajoling compliance through its One World Religion (worship of the Beast and the Dragon (Antichrist and Satan)).
What is poetically ironic is that all these leftist movements (Sexual Revolution, Feminist movement, Gay rights movement, LGBT movement, etc) are all pawns in a Satanic chess game. They are all a means to an end: the end of humanity. The death of life.
These various groups are founded and funded by the same elites* who are ushering in the NWO for their lord and master, Lucifer. Once each group has served its purpose, it is then cannibalised by another group. For example, the Feminist movement which touted the equality of women and the right of a woman to have supreme autonomy over her own body (including aborting the body of another human being, by the way) is now flushed away, because said women will be forced to have potions injected into their bodies which will do all sorts of horrid things, as African women have found out. What happened to My Body My Choice? Oh, it was just a ruse? I get it now!
And we have to ask: what is going to happen to the Romance languages (French, Spanish Italian, etc) that are derived from Latin and thus assign a gender to practically everything? Will these languages be forced to give up their gender-specificity in order to not offend?
This whole thing is nothing more, as I said, than an attack on humanity. We are attacked medically, philosophically, religiously, linguistically. There is nothing about mankind that isn't under attack. And all these leftists are useful idiots to Satan. They blindly implement the very regime that is actually going to destroy them.
I know it's uncharitable and unchristian for me to say this, and God forgive me, but I do get a sense of schadenfreude about watching leftists get eaten by their own.
* These elites may or may not be the supposed 13 Bloodlines of the Illuminati.
Syncretism and One World Religion being brought into the Church by courtesy of Jorge Mario Bergoglio
Ann Barnhardt: Breaking Bombshell in Italy: “We are talking about a virus, Covid, which is absolutely trivial. The death toll is all false. This virus is not capable of killing in any way.”