Commentary #5 of 2021: WHO changes COVID testing criteria....ONE HOUR after Biden installed as Putative President
LifeSite reportage here.
Ann Barnhardt's coverage here.
So, the WHO has come out and admitted that current PCR tests are wrong, like all Covid-sceptics kept saying, and so are calling for a change in the testing, this time requiring that a second test be taken to prove positivity. Since we know that the current PCR tests have a 95% false positive rate, we can expect to see - should this change be enacted - a MASSIVE reduction in the number of cases around the world.
They did this ONE HOUR after Biden was installed as Putative President of the United States. This is clearly designed to make it look like Biden has saved everyone from Covid. You just KNOW this is all political and none of this Covid bulls**t was EVER about people's lives or health. The Elite not only couldn't give a toss about your life or your health, but they are on record as wanting to END your life!
Just another day under the World-Wide Scamdemic.
Commentary #4 of 2021: Welcome to the UK, where getting a coffee could kill someone, whilst it is PUBLICLY ADMITTED ON NATIONAL NEWS THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN INFLATING THE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE WHO'VE ACTUALLY DIED FROM THE MAGIC VIRUS
Her Majesty's Government is engaging in full on fear mongering with its new campaigns. Here are some posts with posters. Remember: these are official posters, part of official Government campaigns. And don't forget what the Health Secretary said: There is no schedule to ending Lockdown III.
The UK Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, admitting on live TV that he hasn't got a schedule for ending the current National Imprisonment in my home country of the United Kingdom. Yep, that's because these lockdowns will be going on per omnia saecula saeculorum. For ever and ever, essentially.
Welcome to the New World Order, to the Kingdom of Antichrist.
Commentary #1 of 2021: If you actually believe Trump called for violence, then you're terminally stupid, incurably moronic and functionally retarded
The extraordinary events in the US are nothing short of astounding. Not only did the Democrats commit the biggest election fraud in US history, but the Republican Party failed to stand by him and effectively challenge the fraud and the Electoral Votes. His own Vice-President himself failed to do his job and send the Electoral Voters back to the States. Pence essentially stabbed Trump in the back via his ignorance of what the extent of his powers are. I mean, how on earth does a man get into a high state office and not bother to read the proverbial manual that lists the extent of his constitutional powers?! Duh! If I got elected to office, I'd make it my task to know EXACTLY what I can do - you know, just in case.
Then on 6th January - the Epiphany - Trump held a rally in Washington DC, during which some of his supporters got duped by Antifa-in-disguise-as-Trump-supporters to invade Congress. That, and the Capitol Police actually LET them in. It was clearly a set-up. Four people got killed during the rioting at Congress. One woman was an unarmed-veteran who was shot by the police.
Now, Trump is being blamed for inciting violence because during the rally he called on his supporters to "fight back" against the establishment and to "march to" the Capitol. That, apparently, is inciting violence. As of writing, the US House of Representatives is going ahead to impeach Trump a second time. Apparently, it looks like the Senate will also vote to impeach Trump - yes, Republicans are probably going to impeach Trump. Why? Because GOP politicians are dumb enough to believe what the extremely, in-your-face, anti-Trump MSM have claimed, i.e., that Trump incited violence.
We are now seeing Republicans and former Trump supporters now turning on Trump, well, those in the Government anyway. As far as I am aware, very few actual Trump voters believe the MSM narrative, naturally, because they aren't dumb or have amnesia when it suits them. And let me be frank: Trump was always a one-man army within the Government. He was an outsider. The GOP only got behind him when it was politically expedient to do so. I had a feeling that they'd turn on him/dump him at some point, whenever the Trump Train came to a stop either after four years or eight years.
And for those on the right who accept the MSM narrative that Trump called for violence, here is my response: Do you honestly believe that a man who for four years repeatedly condemned violence, condemned radical ideologies, didn't start any new wars, supported the police, re-established law and order, achieved historic peace in the Middle East between Israel and three Arab nations, and achieved some peace with North Korea, would tarnish his image and reputation of being the "President of Peace" by calling on his supporters to commit acts of violence that him himself spent four years condemning? If you do believe that, then you are terminally stupid, incurably moronic and functionally retarded. You were clearly never a Trump supporter, you were only riding the train for as long as it was good for you, and obviously haven't been engaged with what Trump has been doing and saying for the past four years. [EDIT 14/01/21: You are also a moron for believing the lies of the same MSM who have been lying about Trump for 4+ years. You all defended him against the lying MSM, but now you BELIEVE what they're telling you?! You really are that stupid, aren't you? Admit it.]
Conservatives who have come out against Trump have clearly proven that stupidity, moronity and retardation affects both sides of the political spectrum; that it's not only leftists that suffer with being cretins. Obviously these "conservatives" have forgotten that calling for people to "fight back" is used by politicians all the time in reference to voters legitimately voting out of party, or for lawmakers to democratically fight against another party. My God, are people that dimwitted? Are we going to start prosecuting anyone who uses the phrase even in a lawful, democratic manner?
The world fell asleep and woke up to find itself afflicted with full-on mental retardation!
Paul Joseph Watson over at Infowars is reporting that the white liberals of the Capitol Hill Organised Protest (CHOP; formerly known as CHAZ) zone, the hell-hole set up in the midst of Seattle, are enforcing a segregated park for black people only. One quote in the short article says: “Segregation is back in vogue. CHAZ/CHOP establishes “black only” spaces. It’s like Jim Crow all over again except it’s woke to be racist and corporations throw billions of dollars at you.”
Segregation is back in vogue. It's woke to be racist.
And we already have secession going on in Seattle like the good old days of the Confederacy (run by Democrats, incidentally)! This is the American Civil War, 2.0.
But, it's always been vogue and woke to be racist for Democrats. Jim Crow Laws, anyone?
Even Wikipedia, which has been scrubbing any truth from its pages, admits in the first two sentences in its article on Jim Crow Laws:
Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States. All were enacted in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by white Democratic-dominated state legislatures to disenfranchise and remove political and economic gains made by blacks during the Reconstruction period.
It later goes on to blatantly state:
In the 1870s, Democrats gradually regained power in the Southern legislatures, after having used insurgent paramilitary groups, such as the White League and the Red Shirts, to disrupt Republican organizing, run Republican officeholders out of town, and intimidate blacks to suppress their voting. Extensive voter fraud was also used. In one instance, an outright coup or insurrection in coastal North Carolina led to the violent removal of democratically elected non-Democratic party executive and representative officials, who were either hunted down or hounded out. Gubernatorial elections were close and had been disputed in Louisiana for years, with increasing violence against blacks during campaigns from 1868 onward.
Sound familiar? Paramilitary groups, the colours white and red, intimidation, suppression of black people, voter fraud, insurrection, violent removals....That sounds an awful lot like Antifa/BLM, the white liberals who run them sporting red Commie paraphernalia, using violence to intimidate, and then causing insurrection by establishing CHAZ/CHOP/COMMIE-CENTRAL in the middle of Seattle, doesn't it?
Something about history repeating itself comes to mind....
Mmm, it's couldn't be that the Democrat Party is doing today what its always been doing! Surely not!
Remember, when Joe Biden says that you can't be black if you don't vote for him, he's only expressing true Democrat values. And I wonder how long it will take for him to quote Alexander H. Stephens, the Vice President of the Confederacy, when he famously said: Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.
And so you can see that I am not lying, I've highlighted the text of the Wikipedia article I quoted above:
#BlackLivesMatter....but only those who live in the First World and have more privilege than any black African could possibly dream of
9 million Africans are still enslaved.
But you won't hear a blessed word from #BlackLivesMatter or any Leftist Fake News. It seems that the only black lives that really matter are the privileged, First World black lives of the prosperous and wealthy West. Sod the black lives that live in the Third World, right?
Maybe a new hashtag could be #SlaveLivesMatter. But, it'll probably be banned by Social Media for being racist or some such nonsense. As I stated in my previous post, white slavery is a thing.
Since the tragic death of George Floyd in the US, the subject of black oppression and historical slavery of black people has once again been brought up. But, as usual, emotions get in the way of truth. And because the narrative is being driven by a particular viewpoint, the cold, hard and uncomfortable truths about slavery are suppressed.
So let us take a brief look at these hard truths. Ready? These come in no particular order:
1) Slavery is as old as the human race. Men have been enslaving other men for centuries. Every civilisation used slavery as a form of labour. All the ancient empires used slavery. It's a fact of life. And another factoid is that slavery still exists today around Africa. In Niger, for example, Wikipedia states: Slavery continues to exist in Niger today. The most significant survey of slavery in Niger identified 11,000 respondents throughout the country who were identified as being slaves. Using further responses from these a partial sample revealed 43,000 slaves. Further extrapolating from this information, and including the children of slaves, the anti-slavery organization Timidria estimated a possible total of 870,363 slaves (both chattel slaves and passive slaves) in Niger in 2002–2003.
2) The word "slave" is interesting. Why? Because it comes from the ethnonym slav, in reference to the Slavic peoples of Eastern Europe. In the Early Middle Ages, the Moors who conquered Iberia travelled to Eastern Europe in order to capture and sell Slavs into slavery. Did you get that? Black African/Arab Muslims enslaved white, Christian, Europeans. And the Slavs weren't the only Europeans to made into slaves. The Christians of Iberia were turned into slaves, and the beautiful women amongst them were carted off to become the concubine of some far off Muslim prince. So, the word slave itself is derived from black-on-white slavery. White slavery is a thing. Again, it doesn't take too much research to find out that even white people were enslaved either by other white people, or by non-white people.
3) Various African nations engaged extensively in slavery for centuries. For example, the Empire of Ethiopia sold its own subjects to Muslim slavers. Ultimately, when the Transatlantic Slave Trade began to take form, the colonialists found their African slaves already enslaved and ready to buy. From whom did they buy these slaves? From the Muslim Arabs and Africans who already had a fruitful supply of slaves from Africa.
4) A big part of African slavery was the emergence and dominance of Islam. Muslim Arabs enslaved the African peoples they conquered, just like they enslaved white Europeans as well. Later, the European colonialists bought slaves from the Arab Slave Trade, and on many occasions actually took over many of these trade routes from the Arabs/African Muslims.
5) A little known fact (and one that will be most embarrassing to our leftists adversaries) is that one of the first cases of legalised slavery in the English colonies of North America involved a black man from Angola (then a colony of the Portuguese Empire). He was captured by the Portuguese, named Anthony, and then sold to a colonist in the Colony of Virginia as a indentured servant. He (together his wife Mary whom he married whilst a servant) was given freedom around 1635, and later became a very prosperous and wealthy man. He was granted land by the said Colony of Virginia, on which he grew tobacco. He owned around 150 acres of land. And who farmed this land for our Anthony? None other than African servants. One such servant, John Casor, was later ordered by the Northampton Court to remain a permanent indentured servant to Anthony, or what we would call a slave. That's right. The first black man to be a legal slave in British North America had a master who was himself an African. Repeat for full retention: a black man was one of the first men in British North America to legally own a slave! So all of you BLM and other liberals can put that in your pipe and smoke it.
6) Those scarfs worn by Democrat politicians in the US are called Kente scarfs. They are the traditional vesture of the Ashanti people of present day Ghana. In times past, they were worn by the royalty of the Ashanti Empire. The background to this Empire is that the Ashanti engaged in slavery. So, the scarfs worn by Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer represent Ashanti royals who sold their own subjects into slavery. Is the donning of this scarf a symbol of how Democrats have, for decades, kept blacks under control, and how even black Democrat politicians sell their own people out for power, money and prestige?
7) A documentary on Britain's role in the slave trade follows three particular white people who have a black slave ancestor, that is, these white English people are directly descended from black slaves. This proves a point: that you don't need to be black to be the descendant of a slave, and that thinking that only black people could ever possibly be the descendants of slaves is, well, racist. And if we're going to pay reparations to the descendants of slaves, these white English people would need to be paid said reparations. And of course, one would possibly find many black people in the West whose ancestors sold other black people into slavery. One can quickly see that the Leftist argument that if you're white you MUST be the descendant of slavers and if you're black you MUST be the descendant of slaves is proved false.
8) The descendants of black slaves who now live in America have a life far better than their ancestors. This is proof that God can draw straight with crooked lines. The movement of black people from Africa to the Colonies has now resulted in Black Americans becoming part of the American Dream. Black Americans (and blacks in the West in general) have access to things that blacks in Africa could only dream of accessing. One would have to ask: if life in the West is so bad for you, why not remove yourself to the land of your ancestors? I think we all know the answer to that question.
9) It's one thing to peacefully protest about real injustices in society, but it's another to bitch about an historical event that cannot be changed. What's done is done, and nothing can change that. You don't see Tunisians complaining about how the Romans 2,000+ years ago destroyed Carthage and enslaved the entire population of the city, do you? Why? Because they're clever enough to know that modern Romans/Italians can't change an event that happened 20 centuries ago. And nothing can change the slave trade.
10) A really dangerous thing for a black man to do is actually act out the racial stereotype that many think him to be. Seeing the videos of black people rioting and looting stores for stupid things like Nike trainers (sneakers) just feeds stereotypes and prejudices that some have against black people. It just makes actual racists solid in their belief that black people are animals who can't be civilised and thus must be pacified, with force even. And frankly, is it sad and tragic to watch black youths cajoled into acting out stereotypes, advised (of course) by white leftists who are (as we have all seen) the biggest racists to walk the face of God's green earth. I mean, if Joe Biden's claim that if you don't vote Democrat then you're not really black isn't as racist as heck, then I don't know what is.
The sexualisation of children is a facet of the Satanic Agenda and put into place by Diabolical Narcissists, who, as we know, love to victimise vulnerable people, especially children. The whole sordid business of literally grooming children via pornographic sexual education is meant to turn innocent young people into raging DN's and destroy any morality they have. To teach children about sexual intercourse - and especially the most debased form of it like sodomy - is paedophilia. Full stop. What we have is institutionalised paedophilia. It's sick, twisted, disgusting, odious and perverted to the highest degree.
People who peddle this disgusting raping of children's innocence should be hung, drawn and quartered, or, to follow the example of Christ Himself, have a millstone wrapped about their necks and drowned in the depth of the sea!
Parents fumed as a United Kingdom school set their children inappropriate questions regarding the categorization of certain forms of pornography. Children between the ages of 11-14 were asked to define types of pornography ranging from “soft,” “hardcore,” and even “transsexual” as part of their assignment.
Included in the insensitive work was female genital mutilation, male circumcision, breast ironing, wet dreams, and trafficking, among other controversial themes.
According to the Hull Daily Mail, children in Years 7, 8 and 9 at Archbishop Sentamu Academy in east Hull, Yorkshire, were required to fulfill a homework task involving the explicit content.
Additionally, the children were asked to tackle questions about drinking, smoking, and drug use.
The school since apologized since the homework topics racked up complaints from parents.
A mother, who came forward about the homework, said that if her young daughter had searched for help to complete the homework online, she could have been exposed to age-inappropriate content–causing psychological damage.
The mother said: “My daughter is still very much a child, we’ve still got magic elves, her bedroom is done in My Little Pony. She is very innocent and naïve.
“She was only in primary school last year living her best life, now she is being asked to search for hardcore pornography.
“She’s 11, she should be doing stranger danger, and don’t share your info online, but genital mutilation is another thing. It was asking about male circumcision, breast ironing…I don’t even know what that is myself.”
This is not the first time sexually explicit content has become part of young British students’ curricula.
National File reported on a UK council responsible for a now-defunct online ‘sextionary’ accessible to students involving a list of extreme fetishes and paraphilias, including “felching” and “c**k and ball torture.”
Via National File:
Yet another bizarre story to emerge from the UK involving its hypersexualized curriculum.
Other schools across the UK have come under fire for introducing taboo or adult materials to their students, angering parents.
UN calls for gender-neutral language whilst hypocritically calling one of its entities "UN Women" - a gender-specific name!
The United Nations (aka, the precursor to the New World Order ruled over by Antichrist) is calling for gender-neutral language when referring to certain persons/professions.
In a tweet put out by the UN, it has a list of gender-specific words and their gender-neutral replacements, as seen below:
Ironically, the UN entity that pushed this is none other than the UN Women. The website for UN Women describes itself as:
the United Nations entity dedicated to gender equality and the empowerment of women. A global champion for women and girls, UN Women was established to accelerate progress on meeting their needs worldwide.
I could go into a whole essay about how stupid all this is. The New World Order is pushing its androgyny on society. No one can be anything anymore. We are all to become sterile hermaphrodites, living in Smart Cities with 24/7 surveillance courtesy of Big Tech on behalf of Antichrist, with the Antichurch ruled over by the Antipope (i.e. the False Prophet Forerunner of Antichrist (who may or may not be Bergoglio)) cajoling compliance through its One World Religion (worship of the Beast and the Dragon (Antichrist and Satan)).
What is poetically ironic is that all these leftist movements (Sexual Revolution, Feminist movement, Gay rights movement, LGBT movement, etc) are all pawns in a Satanic chess game. They are all a means to an end: the end of humanity. The death of life.
These various groups are founded and funded by the same elites* who are ushering in the NWO for their lord and master, Lucifer. Once each group has served its purpose, it is then cannibalised by another group. For example, the Feminist movement which touted the equality of women and the right of a woman to have supreme autonomy over her own body (including aborting the body of another human being, by the way) is now flushed away, because said women will be forced to have potions injected into their bodies which will do all sorts of horrid things, as African women have found out. What happened to My Body My Choice? Oh, it was just a ruse? I get it now!
And we have to ask: what is going to happen to the Romance languages (French, Spanish Italian, etc) that are derived from Latin and thus assign a gender to practically everything? Will these languages be forced to give up their gender-specificity in order to not offend?
This whole thing is nothing more, as I said, than an attack on humanity. We are attacked medically, philosophically, religiously, linguistically. There is nothing about mankind that isn't under attack. And all these leftists are useful idiots to Satan. They blindly implement the very regime that is actually going to destroy them.
I know it's uncharitable and unchristian for me to say this, and God forgive me, but I do get a sense of schadenfreude about watching leftists get eaten by their own.
* These elites may or may not be the supposed 13 Bloodlines of the Illuminati.
Ann Barnhardt: You have GOT to be kidding me, chapter 837: The enzyme that is used in the Quantum Dot ID that Bill Gates will use for the Mark of the Beast fake vaccine is called… wait for it… Luciferase
Documentary exposing Scientists and St. Corona's Virus has been scrubbed from YouTube, but can be watched on Bitchute