Paul Joseph Watson over at Infowars is reporting that the white liberals of the Capitol Hill Organised Protest (CHOP; formerly known as CHAZ) zone, the hell-hole set up in the midst of Seattle, are enforcing a segregated park for black people only. One quote in the short article says: “Segregation is back in vogue. CHAZ/CHOP establishes “black only” spaces. It’s like Jim Crow all over again except it’s woke to be racist and corporations throw billions of dollars at you.”
Segregation is back in vogue. It's woke to be racist.
And we already have secession going on in Seattle like the good old days of the Confederacy (run by Democrats, incidentally)! This is the American Civil War, 2.0.
But, it's always been vogue and woke to be racist for Democrats. Jim Crow Laws, anyone?
Even Wikipedia, which has been scrubbing any truth from its pages, admits in the first two sentences in its article on Jim Crow Laws:
Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States. All were enacted in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by white Democratic-dominated state legislatures to disenfranchise and remove political and economic gains made by blacks during the Reconstruction period.
It later goes on to blatantly state:
In the 1870s, Democrats gradually regained power in the Southern legislatures, after having used insurgent paramilitary groups, such as the White League and the Red Shirts, to disrupt Republican organizing, run Republican officeholders out of town, and intimidate blacks to suppress their voting. Extensive voter fraud was also used. In one instance, an outright coup or insurrection in coastal North Carolina led to the violent removal of democratically elected non-Democratic party executive and representative officials, who were either hunted down or hounded out. Gubernatorial elections were close and had been disputed in Louisiana for years, with increasing violence against blacks during campaigns from 1868 onward.
Sound familiar? Paramilitary groups, the colours white and red, intimidation, suppression of black people, voter fraud, insurrection, violent removals....That sounds an awful lot like Antifa/BLM, the white liberals who run them sporting red Commie paraphernalia, using violence to intimidate, and then causing insurrection by establishing CHAZ/CHOP/COMMIE-CENTRAL in the middle of Seattle, doesn't it?
Something about history repeating itself comes to mind....
Mmm, it's couldn't be that the Democrat Party is doing today what its always been doing! Surely not!
Remember, when Joe Biden says that you can't be black if you don't vote for him, he's only expressing true Democrat values. And I wonder how long it will take for him to quote Alexander H. Stephens, the Vice President of the Confederacy, when he famously said: Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.
And so you can see that I am not lying, I've highlighted the text of the Wikipedia article I quoted above:
#BlackLivesMatter....but only those who live in the First World and have more privilege than any black African could possibly dream of
9 million Africans are still enslaved.
But you won't hear a blessed word from #BlackLivesMatter or any Leftist Fake News. It seems that the only black lives that really matter are the privileged, First World black lives of the prosperous and wealthy West. Sod the black lives that live in the Third World, right?
Maybe a new hashtag could be #SlaveLivesMatter. But, it'll probably be banned by Social Media for being racist or some such nonsense. As I stated in my previous post, white slavery is a thing.
Since the tragic death of George Floyd in the US, the subject of black oppression and historical slavery of black people has once again been brought up. But, as usual, emotions get in the way of truth. And because the narrative is being driven by a particular viewpoint, the cold, hard and uncomfortable truths about slavery are suppressed.
So let us take a brief look at these hard truths. Ready? These come in no particular order:
1) Slavery is as old as the human race. Men have been enslaving other men for centuries. Every civilisation used slavery as a form of labour. All the ancient empires used slavery. It's a fact of life. And another factoid is that slavery still exists today around Africa. In Niger, for example, Wikipedia states: Slavery continues to exist in Niger today. The most significant survey of slavery in Niger identified 11,000 respondents throughout the country who were identified as being slaves. Using further responses from these a partial sample revealed 43,000 slaves. Further extrapolating from this information, and including the children of slaves, the anti-slavery organization Timidria estimated a possible total of 870,363 slaves (both chattel slaves and passive slaves) in Niger in 2002–2003.
2) The word "slave" is interesting. Why? Because it comes from the ethnonym slav, in reference to the Slavic peoples of Eastern Europe. In the Early Middle Ages, the Moors who conquered Iberia travelled to Eastern Europe in order to capture and sell Slavs into slavery. Did you get that? Black African/Arab Muslims enslaved white, Christian, Europeans. And the Slavs weren't the only Europeans to made into slaves. The Christians of Iberia were turned into slaves, and the beautiful women amongst them were carted off to become the concubine of some far off Muslim prince. So, the word slave itself is derived from black-on-white slavery. White slavery is a thing. Again, it doesn't take too much research to find out that even white people were enslaved either by other white people, or by non-white people.
3) Various African nations engaged extensively in slavery for centuries. For example, the Empire of Ethiopia sold its own subjects to Muslim slavers. Ultimately, when the Transatlantic Slave Trade began to take form, the colonialists found their African slaves already enslaved and ready to buy. From whom did they buy these slaves? From the Muslim Arabs and Africans who already had a fruitful supply of slaves from Africa.
4) A big part of African slavery was the emergence and dominance of Islam. Muslim Arabs enslaved the African peoples they conquered, just like they enslaved white Europeans as well. Later, the European colonialists bought slaves from the Arab Slave Trade, and on many occasions actually took over many of these trade routes from the Arabs/African Muslims.
5) A little known fact (and one that will be most embarrassing to our leftists adversaries) is that one of the first cases of legalised slavery in the English colonies of North America involved a black man from Angola (then a colony of the Portuguese Empire). He was captured by the Portuguese, named Anthony, and then sold to a colonist in the Colony of Virginia as a indentured servant. He (together his wife Mary whom he married whilst a servant) was given freedom around 1635, and later became a very prosperous and wealthy man. He was granted land by the said Colony of Virginia, on which he grew tobacco. He owned around 150 acres of land. And who farmed this land for our Anthony? None other than African servants. One such servant, John Casor, was later ordered by the Northampton Court to remain a permanent indentured servant to Anthony, or what we would call a slave. That's right. The first black man to be a legal slave in British North America had a master who was himself an African. Repeat for full retention: a black man was one of the first men in British North America to legally own a slave! So all of you BLM and other liberals can put that in your pipe and smoke it.
6) Those scarfs worn by Democrat politicians in the US are called Kente scarfs. They are the traditional vesture of the Ashanti people of present day Ghana. In times past, they were worn by the royalty of the Ashanti Empire. The background to this Empire is that the Ashanti engaged in slavery. So, the scarfs worn by Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer represent Ashanti royals who sold their own subjects into slavery. Is the donning of this scarf a symbol of how Democrats have, for decades, kept blacks under control, and how even black Democrat politicians sell their own people out for power, money and prestige?
7) A documentary on Britain's role in the slave trade follows three particular white people who have a black slave ancestor, that is, these white English people are directly descended from black slaves. This proves a point: that you don't need to be black to be the descendant of a slave, and that thinking that only black people could ever possibly be the descendants of slaves is, well, racist. And if we're going to pay reparations to the descendants of slaves, these white English people would need to be paid said reparations. And of course, one would possibly find many black people in the West whose ancestors sold other black people into slavery. One can quickly see that the Leftist argument that if you're white you MUST be the descendant of slavers and if you're black you MUST be the descendant of slaves is proved false.
8) The descendants of black slaves who now live in America have a life far better than their ancestors. This is proof that God can draw straight with crooked lines. The movement of black people from Africa to the Colonies has now resulted in Black Americans becoming part of the American Dream. Black Americans (and blacks in the West in general) have access to things that blacks in Africa could only dream of accessing. One would have to ask: if life in the West is so bad for you, why not remove yourself to the land of your ancestors? I think we all know the answer to that question.
9) It's one thing to peacefully protest about real injustices in society, but it's another to bitch about an historical event that cannot be changed. What's done is done, and nothing can change that. You don't see Tunisians complaining about how the Romans 2,000+ years ago destroyed Carthage and enslaved the entire population of the city, do you? Why? Because they're clever enough to know that modern Romans/Italians can't change an event that happened 20 centuries ago. And nothing can change the slave trade.
10) A really dangerous thing for a black man to do is actually act out the racial stereotype that many think him to be. Seeing the videos of black people rioting and looting stores for stupid things like Nike trainers (sneakers) just feeds stereotypes and prejudices that some have against black people. It just makes actual racists solid in their belief that black people are animals who can't be civilised and thus must be pacified, with force even. And frankly, is it sad and tragic to watch black youths cajoled into acting out stereotypes, advised (of course) by white leftists who are (as we have all seen) the biggest racists to walk the face of God's green earth. I mean, if Joe Biden's claim that if you don't vote Democrat then you're not really black isn't as racist as heck, then I don't know what is.
The sexualisation of children is a facet of the Satanic Agenda and put into place by Diabolical Narcissists, who, as we know, love to victimise vulnerable people, especially children. The whole sordid business of literally grooming children via pornographic sexual education is meant to turn innocent young people into raging DN's and destroy any morality they have. To teach children about sexual intercourse - and especially the most debased form of it like sodomy - is paedophilia. Full stop. What we have is institutionalised paedophilia. It's sick, twisted, disgusting, odious and perverted to the highest degree.
People who peddle this disgusting raping of children's innocence should be hung, drawn and quartered, or, to follow the example of Christ Himself, have a millstone wrapped about their necks and drowned in the depth of the sea!
Parents fumed as a United Kingdom school set their children inappropriate questions regarding the categorization of certain forms of pornography. Children between the ages of 11-14 were asked to define types of pornography ranging from “soft,” “hardcore,” and even “transsexual” as part of their assignment.
Included in the insensitive work was female genital mutilation, male circumcision, breast ironing, wet dreams, and trafficking, among other controversial themes.
According to the Hull Daily Mail, children in Years 7, 8 and 9 at Archbishop Sentamu Academy in east Hull, Yorkshire, were required to fulfill a homework task involving the explicit content.
Additionally, the children were asked to tackle questions about drinking, smoking, and drug use.
The school since apologized since the homework topics racked up complaints from parents.
A mother, who came forward about the homework, said that if her young daughter had searched for help to complete the homework online, she could have been exposed to age-inappropriate content–causing psychological damage.
The mother said: “My daughter is still very much a child, we’ve still got magic elves, her bedroom is done in My Little Pony. She is very innocent and naïve.
“She was only in primary school last year living her best life, now she is being asked to search for hardcore pornography.
“She’s 11, she should be doing stranger danger, and don’t share your info online, but genital mutilation is another thing. It was asking about male circumcision, breast ironing…I don’t even know what that is myself.”
This is not the first time sexually explicit content has become part of young British students’ curricula.
National File reported on a UK council responsible for a now-defunct online ‘sextionary’ accessible to students involving a list of extreme fetishes and paraphilias, including “felching” and “c**k and ball torture.”
Via National File:
Yet another bizarre story to emerge from the UK involving its hypersexualized curriculum.
Other schools across the UK have come under fire for introducing taboo or adult materials to their students, angering parents.
UN calls for gender-neutral language whilst hypocritically calling one of its entities "UN Women" - a gender-specific name!
The United Nations (aka, the precursor to the New World Order ruled over by Antichrist) is calling for gender-neutral language when referring to certain persons/professions.
In a tweet put out by the UN, it has a list of gender-specific words and their gender-neutral replacements, as seen below:
Ironically, the UN entity that pushed this is none other than the UN Women. The website for UN Women describes itself as:
the United Nations entity dedicated to gender equality and the empowerment of women. A global champion for women and girls, UN Women was established to accelerate progress on meeting their needs worldwide.
I could go into a whole essay about how stupid all this is. The New World Order is pushing its androgyny on society. No one can be anything anymore. We are all to become sterile hermaphrodites, living in Smart Cities with 24/7 surveillance courtesy of Big Tech on behalf of Antichrist, with the Antichurch ruled over by the Antipope (i.e. the False Prophet Forerunner of Antichrist (who may or may not be Bergoglio)) cajoling compliance through its One World Religion (worship of the Beast and the Dragon (Antichrist and Satan)).
What is poetically ironic is that all these leftist movements (Sexual Revolution, Feminist movement, Gay rights movement, LGBT movement, etc) are all pawns in a Satanic chess game. They are all a means to an end: the end of humanity. The death of life.
These various groups are founded and funded by the same elites* who are ushering in the NWO for their lord and master, Lucifer. Once each group has served its purpose, it is then cannibalised by another group. For example, the Feminist movement which touted the equality of women and the right of a woman to have supreme autonomy over her own body (including aborting the body of another human being, by the way) is now flushed away, because said women will be forced to have potions injected into their bodies which will do all sorts of horrid things, as African women have found out. What happened to My Body My Choice? Oh, it was just a ruse? I get it now!
And we have to ask: what is going to happen to the Romance languages (French, Spanish Italian, etc) that are derived from Latin and thus assign a gender to practically everything? Will these languages be forced to give up their gender-specificity in order to not offend?
This whole thing is nothing more, as I said, than an attack on humanity. We are attacked medically, philosophically, religiously, linguistically. There is nothing about mankind that isn't under attack. And all these leftists are useful idiots to Satan. They blindly implement the very regime that is actually going to destroy them.
I know it's uncharitable and unchristian for me to say this, and God forgive me, but I do get a sense of schadenfreude about watching leftists get eaten by their own.
* These elites may or may not be the supposed 13 Bloodlines of the Illuminati.
WARNING: ADULT CONTENT. VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED!